If y = f(x), then y = f(x + c) is the same graph shifted c units to the left (or right if c is negative) along the x-axis
For y = x, by changing x to x + c, the above shift is indistinguishable from shifting the graph c units up (or down if c is negative) the y-axis.
It shifts the graph x units to the left (if c is positive).
Answer: you are 3/8 Indian. It's a basic math problem! Your one parent would be 1/2 Indian from grandpa plus 1/4 Indian from grandma (half of 1/2 equals 1/4). 1/2 plus 1/4 equals 3/4. If there's no Indian from your other parent, then you'd be 1/2 of 3/4, which is 3/8 Indian.
Unfortunately, limitations of the browser used by Answers.com means that we cannot see most symbols. It is therefore impossible to give a proper answer to your question. Please resubmit your question spelling out the symbols as "plus", "minus", "times", "equals". As stated, the question refers to y = -3*10 = -30. That is a single point on the Cartesian plane.
Parent are the ideal to their kids . They have to provide peaceful , educative envoirnment to their kids. .
It dependes on the genes of the parent if you have no information of the genes of the parent I cannot tell you
When a function is nested inside another function, the outer one is the parent, the inner is the child.
Not normally. The existence of a step-parent doesn't affect the responsibilities of the parent providing child support.
Constant and Unique
parent
Parent.
NO..if this is a court order i wouldn't keep the child from the other parent, it's only going to affect you in the long run..go by the ORDER!!
Custody should change to the other parent
One of the two ways that parent rock affect the metamorphic process is through the mineral makeup. Another factor is chemical composition.
No. The parent is still the parent and responsible for the child abandoned or not. The child support payments will just keep adding up until the person is found.
Yes...
Termination of one parent's rights does not affect the other parent's rights.
No. Neither parent should forbid the child to be in contact with the other parent unless there exists a court order to that effect. However, the parent who does not have the child at the time should not make a pest out of him/herself so as to intrude on the other parent's time with the child. Likewise, the child should not need to be in constant contact with the other parent. Adults should be able to handle this situation reasonably.No. Neither parent should forbid the child to be in contact with the other parent unless there exists a court order to that effect. However, the parent who does not have the child at the time should not make a pest out of him/herself so as to intrude on the other parent's time with the child. Likewise, the child should not need to be in constant contact with the other parent. Adults should be able to handle this situation reasonably.No. Neither parent should forbid the child to be in contact with the other parent unless there exists a court order to that effect. However, the parent who does not have the child at the time should not make a pest out of him/herself so as to intrude on the other parent's time with the child. Likewise, the child should not need to be in constant contact with the other parent. Adults should be able to handle this situation reasonably.No. Neither parent should forbid the child to be in contact with the other parent unless there exists a court order to that effect. However, the parent who does not have the child at the time should not make a pest out of him/herself so as to intrude on the other parent's time with the child. Likewise, the child should not need to be in constant contact with the other parent. Adults should be able to handle this situation reasonably.
Yes, both are suspended.