Yes, all natural numbers are whole numbers.
No. -3 is a whole number but it is not a natural number.
56 is a rational whole natural number. Or to put it another way: 56 is a Natural number, but as all natural numbers are also whole numbers 56 is also a whole number, but as all whole numbers are also rational numbers 56 is also a rational number. Natural numbers are a [proper] subset of whole numbers; Whole numbers are a [proper] subset of rational numbers. The set of rational numbers along with the set of irrational numbers make up the set of real numbers
They are both whole numbers (integers) and natural numbers.All natural numbers are integers, but integers is a larger group of numbers.The group consists of the natural numbers, zero and the whole negative numbers (e.g. '-4' and '-560').
If you mean larger by "the set of whole numbers strictly contains the set of natural numbers", then yes, but if you mean "the set of whole numbers has a larger cardinality (size) than the set of natural numbers", then no, they have the same size.
Negative integers.
Irrational numbers have infinitely long, non-repeating decimal expansions. They cannot be natural numbers or whole numbers. Those are rational.
Both.
all the whole numbers including zero(0) are called natural numbers. 0 is the smallest natural number and the greatest number is unknown because natural numbers are endless .
Counting numbers, positive integers, natural numbers.
Yes. You know this is true because you learned a process-- an "algorithm"--for adding two numbers together, and if you start with two whole numbers, the result is also a whole number.
10 belongs to the set "natural numbers", but it can also belong to whole numbers, and rational numbers