if a is bigger than b and b is bigger than c a must be bigger than c... Transitivity
Theorem
I don't think that there is a number bigger than its square as you are timesing the number Not true. Any number between 0 and 1 is bigger than its square.
An example of a conditional statement is: If I throw this ball into the air, it will come down.In "if A then B", A is the antecedent, and B is the consequent.
true
Step 1: Formulate the statement to be proven by induction. Step 2: Show that there is at least one value of the natural numbers, n, for which the statement is true. Step 3: Show that, if you assume it is true for any natural number m, greater or equal to n, then it must be true for the next value, m+1. Then, by induction, you have proven that the statement (step 1) is true for all natural numbers greater than or equal to n. Note that n need not be 1.
No, the converse of a statement does not necessarily have to be true. In this case, the original statement "If you are hungry then you are not happy" does not imply that its converse "If you are not happy then you must be hungry" is always true. It is possible to be unhappy for reasons other than hunger.
A+
not b not a its contrapositive
The below statement is false. The above statement is true. I am lying. I am lying when I say I am lying.
No, the converse of a statement is not always true. In this case, if you wear a jacket, it does not necessarily mean that it must be cold; you may choose to wear a jacket for reasons other than cold temperature, such as fashion or personal preference.
If we assume that only one statement is true, and given the conflicting statements, we can deduce that Amos' statement must be true. Therefore, Henry must have at least 1 brother.
if a is true, then b must be true
The fallacy of the inverse occurs when someone assumes that if a statement is true, then its opposite must also be true. This is a logical error because just because a statement is true, it does not mean that its opposite is true as well. This fallacy is important in logical reasoning because it highlights the need to carefully evaluate each statement on its own merits, rather than assuming that its opposite must also be true.
One classic example of a paradox is the "liar paradox," which revolves around a statement that cannot consistently be true or false. An example would be the statement "This statement is false." If the statement is true, then it must be false, but if it is false, then it must be true, creating a paradoxical situation.
Every statement apart from the axioms or postulates.
The 'answer' is the number that 'x' must be in order to make the statement true. If 'x' is anything different from -7, then the statement "x = -7" is not true. So the 'answer' must be -7 .
true, a rhino is bigger then a cat.