No, -.5 repeating is not an integer because an integer is a whole number without decimals or fractions
No, 33 is an integer. 0.3333 repeating is a repeating decimal.
No.
No, if it has a decimal place then its not an integer
No, 6.57 repeating (often written as 6.57̅) is not an integer. An integer is a whole number, which can be positive, negative, or zero, without any decimal or fractional part. Since 6.57 repeating has a decimal component, it is classified as a rational number, not an integer.
No, it is an integer.
is -4 a integer
No, 33 is an integer. 0.3333 repeating is a repeating decimal.
No.
No, if it has a decimal place then its not an integer
No, 6.57 repeating (often written as 6.57̅) is not an integer. An integer is a whole number, which can be positive, negative, or zero, without any decimal or fractional part. Since 6.57 repeating has a decimal component, it is classified as a rational number, not an integer.
No, it is an integer.
No, it is an integer.
No.
It can, since 0.999...=1. Therefore zero point nine repeating is an integer. Other repeating-decimal integers are 1.999..., 2.999...., -1.999..., etc.
0.999 repeating = 1 (the integer).
It is the integer 10.
No, because 0.9 repeating is 1, which is an integer, not a "normal" fraction.