3 is not divisible by 126. 126 is divisible by 3.
3 is not divisible by 72. 72 is divisible by 3.
512 is not divisible by 3.
Multiples of 9 and 6 are also divisible by three, the reverse is not true. 15 is divisible by 3, but not 6 or 9. 27 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not 6. 12 is divisible by 3 and 6, but not 9. 54 is divisible by 3, 6 and 9.
A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible both by 2 and 3 1240 is even then is divisible by 2 1+2+4+0 = 7 which is not divisible by 3 then 1240 is not divisible by 3 Thus 1240 is not divisible by 6
No, it is divisible by 1, 3, 5, 15, 353, 1059, 1765, 5295
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 353, 706, 1059, 1412, 2118, 4236.
2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15, 18, 30, 45, 90, 353, 706, 1059, 1765, 2118, 3177, 3530, 5295, 6354, 10590, 15885.
No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
If the same calendar were applied to the year 1059 as to 2011, January 10, 1059 would fall on a Sunday.
Multiples of 353 include 353, 706, 1059, 1412, 1765, and so on.
1253 = 1,953,125
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
Yes, if x is an integer divisible by 3, then x^2 is also divisible by 3. This is because for any integer x, x^2 will also be divisible by 3 if x is divisible by 3. This can be proven using the property that the square of any integer divisible by 3 will also be divisible by 3.
NO. 313 is not divisible by 3.A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3.313 = 3 + 1 + 3 = 7Note: 7 not divisible by 3 thus, 313 is not divisible by 3.
3 is not divisible by 126. 126 is divisible by 3.