No because integers are whole numbers
Yes
321 is an integer, so the closest integer would be 321. (If 321 itself doesn't count, 322 and 320 are the same distance from it, and are the next closest.)
321 is an integer and so there is no sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number.
2247 is not a prime number. Its positive integer factors are: 1, 3, 7, 21, 107, 321, 749, 2247
The factors of 321 are: 1, 3, 107, 321
321%...........you take decimal and multiply it by 100.
321 is an integer so 321
321 is an integer, so the closest integer would be 321. (If 321 itself doesn't count, 322 and 320 are the same distance from it, and are the next closest.)
321 is an integer, not a fraction.
321 is an integer and so there is no sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number.
312 is not a sequence: it is a single 3 digit integer and one number cannot define a sequence.
2247 is not a prime number. Its positive integer factors are: 1, 3, 7, 21, 107, 321, 749, 2247
321 + 321 = 642
The positive integer factors of 1926 are: 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 18, 107, 214, 321, 642, 963, 1926
100% if you are talking about all 321 or them.
There are 321 days in 321 days.
The factors of 321 are: 1, 3, 107, 321
321 = 3*107.