321 is an integer, so the closest integer would be 321. (If 321 itself doesn't count, 322 and 320 are the same distance from it, and are the next closest.)
Well, isn't that a happy little question! If we look at the number 321, we can see that it's right in between 320 and 322. So, the integer closest to 321 is 320. Just like adding a little tree to complete a painting, sometimes we just need to round down to find the closest whole number.
8 is an integer, so the answer is 8
-132
The simplest fraction of 321 is 321/1, also known as the whole number 321. In terms of proper fractions (where the numerator is less than the denominator), the simplest fraction of 321 would be 321/321, which simplifies to 1/1 or just 1.
No - an integer is a whole number - the closest integers to 12.5 are 12 and 13.
An integer is any whole number (1,2,3,-1,-2,-3, etc.). -3.12's closest integer is -3.
321 is an integer so 321
321 is an integer, not a fraction.
312 is not a sequence: it is a single 3 digit integer and one number cannot define a sequence.
No - 0.8 is a decimal number, not an integer. The closest integer is 1.
8 is an integer, so the answer is 8
It is 18 or 20
The closest integer to the left of 4.7 on the number line is 4. Since 4.7 is closer to 5 than it is to 4, the integer to the left of 4.7 is 4. This is because integers are whole numbers without any decimal or fractional parts, so the closest integer to the left of 4.7 is 4.
You can't write a non-integer as an integer. You can round it to the closest integer if you like, but it's not exactly the same number.
-132
12
You would round it to 25.
The simplest fraction of 321 is 321/1, also known as the whole number 321. In terms of proper fractions (where the numerator is less than the denominator), the simplest fraction of 321 would be 321/321, which simplifies to 1/1 or just 1.