CX
the equivalent of 110 in roman numeral is cx
as far as i know the Egyptian numeral system doesn't use zero. sorry i couldn't be more help ;)
The longest Egyptian numeral between 500 and 1500 is 999.That is 9 coiled ropes, 9 heel bones and 9 vertical staffs.
Yes they are and they represent 10 and 110 respectively
CX
the equivalent of 110 in roman numeral is cx
as far as i know the Egyptian numeral system doesn't use zero. sorry i couldn't be more help ;)
See link below.
The longest Egyptian numeral between 500 and 1500 is 999.That is 9 coiled ropes, 9 heel bones and 9 vertical staffs.
See related links. The Egyptian numeral system actually originated from hieroglyphics.
520
Yes they are and they represent 10 and 110 respectively
there is difficulty in the mathematical opperations there is no zero
The Ancient Egyptian decimal numeric system was capable of quite complex calculations, including fractions.The hieroglyphs are:For numeral 1, a simple vertical strokeFor numeral 10, an inverted U shapeFor numeral 100, a spiral shapeFor numeral 1,000, a flower on a tall stemFor numeral 10,000, a fingerFor numeral 100,000, a frogFor numeral 1,000,000, a man with both arms raised.To represent 1,237 the Egyptians would group together a flower, two spirals, three inverted U's and seven vertical strokes.For fractions, the hieroglyph of a mouth (pronounced r, meaning a part) was placed above or in front of the number.See related link for more details.
That is not a valid Roman numeral. - L stands for 50. Normally you would add the two Ls together to get 100; however, 100 is represented by the letter C. LLX is not a valid Roman numeral. If you want to represent 110, use CX.
Aramaic has no word for zero, since that value does not occur in the Aramaic numeral system, nor in Roman numerals or in ancient Hebrew or in ancient Egyptian.