Best Answer

There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.

There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.

There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.

There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.

There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.

There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.

There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.

Study guides

☆☆

More answers

There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.

Q: What is next decimal number of the number 65?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Related questions

Decimal numbers are infinitely dense so there is no "next". Given any number claiming to be next, the average of 65 and that number will always be greater than 65 and nearer, and so have a better claim to be next. Decimal numbers are infinitely dense so there is no "next". Given any number claiming to be next, the average of 65 and that number will always be greater than 65 and nearer, and so have a better claim to be next. Decimal numbers are infinitely dense so there is no "next". Given any number claiming to be next, the average of 65 and that number will always be greater than 65 and nearer, and so have a better claim to be next. Decimal numbers are infinitely dense so there is no "next". Given any number claiming to be next, the average of 65 and that number will always be greater than 65 and nearer, and so have a better claim to be next.

To convert 65% to decimal divide by 100: 65% ÷ 100 = 0.65

Whole Number: 65 Decimal: 65.0 [No amount in decimal places] Fraction: 65/1

65 in decimal form would be the same. The decimal after any whole number is after it, so for instance, 65 = 65.0, 65.00, 65.000, etc.

.65

165

A decimal number is simply a way of representing a number in such a way that the place value of each digit is ten times that of the digit to its right. A decimal representation does not require a decimal point. So the required decimal representation is 65, exactly as in the question.

The second one.

65/100, or 13/20 when simplified.To convert a decimal number into a fraction: 1: place the decimal number over 1 (.65/1) 2: remove the decimal and add as many zeroes to the 1 as there were numbers to the right of the decimal: (.65/1 becomes 65/100) 3: reduce the fraction to its lowest term (65/100 = 13/50)

The next number!

65% as a decimal is 0.65. 65% as a % is 65%. 65% as a fraction is 65/100

Fraction: 65/100 Decimal: .65

People also asked