answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

there is no roman numeral for it



Another answer: The Romans had no numeral to represent zero because there was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus the zero symbol. We add a zero on to the end of a number to convert it to tens and two zeros to convert it to hundreds and so on. The Romans simply had different symbols for tens and hundreds. For example we would write 1, 10, 20, 40, 50, 100 and 200 but the same numbers as Roman numerals would be I, X, XX, XL, L, C and CC, done quite simply with no need for a zero. In the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, began to used the symbol N to represent zero (from the Latin Nullae meaning nothing).

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The Roman numeral system had no zero.

The Roman numeral system had no zero.

The Roman numeral system had no zero.

The Roman numeral system had no zero.

The Roman numeral system had no zero.

The Roman numeral system had no zero.

The Roman numeral system had no zero.

The Roman numeral system had no zero.

The Roman numeral system had no zero.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The Roman numeral system had no zero.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
4y ago

Equal to -

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

o

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

0

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

0

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the Roman numerals for zero?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp