1 over 2 times radical 6
1
when there is no radical in the denominator
You can't simplify it more in radical form
71 is a prime number, so there is no simpler form of radical 71 than radical 71.
1 over 2 times radical 6
1
Well, let's take a moment to appreciate the beauty of numbers. If we want to express 11.31 in radical form, we can write it as √127. Every number has its own unique charm, just like every tree in a painting adds to the beauty of the whole picture.
2.018606997in radical form??
294 is an integer and there is no sensible radical form for it.
No. One of the rules for "simplest form" is that there may be no radical in the denominator. To fix this, multiply top and bottom of the fraction by the radical denominator. For example, ( 1 / √2) = (1 / √2)(√2 / √2) = (√2 / 2)
2i radical 5 * * * * * No. it is ± i*radical(25) which is ± 5i. Not sure why the answer is requireed in radical form.
when there is no radical in the denominator
48 does not need to be put in radical form. But, it can be: √2304
That IS the simplest radical form.
You can't simplify it more in radical form
71 is a prime number, so there is no simpler form of radical 71 than radical 71.