What would be the divisor when dividend 67321 quotient 191 and remainder 7?

Answer 1

There is no integer that meets the requirement.

67321/353 = 190 and remainder 251 is too small and so 353 is too large to be the divisor.

67321/352 = 191 and remainder 89 is too large and so 352 is too small to be the divisor.

The fraction 67314/191 = 352.429 (approx) will do the trick but quotients and remainders are not normally associated with division by fractional numbers.

There is no integer that meets the requirement.

67321/353 = 190 and remainder 251 is too small and so 353 is too large to be the divisor.

67321/352 = 191 and remainder 89 is too large and so 352 is too small to be the divisor.

The fraction 67314/191 = 352.429 (approx) will do the trick but quotients and remainders are not normally associated with division by fractional numbers.

There is no integer that meets the requirement.

67321/353 = 190 and remainder 251 is too small and so 353 is too large to be the divisor.

67321/352 = 191 and remainder 89 is too large and so 352 is too small to be the divisor.

The fraction 67314/191 = 352.429 (approx) will do the trick but quotients and remainders are not normally associated with division by fractional numbers.

There is no integer that meets the requirement.

67321/353 = 190 and remainder 251 is too small and so 353 is too large to be the divisor.

67321/352 = 191 and remainder 89 is too large and so 352 is too small to be the divisor.

The fraction 67314/191 = 352.429 (approx) will do the trick but quotients and remainders are not normally associated with division by fractional numbers.

Answer 2

There is no integer that meets the requirement.

67321/353 = 190 and remainder 251 is too small and so 353 is too large to be the divisor.

67321/352 = 191 and remainder 89 is too large and so 352 is too small to be the divisor.

The fraction 67314/191 = 352.429 (approx) will do the trick but quotients and remainders are not normally associated with division by fractional numbers.