Oh, what a lovely question! You see, both 1 kilogram of copper and 1 kilogram of iron have the same weight because they both weigh 1 kilogram. However, copper is denser than iron, so a 1-kilogram block of copper will take up less space than a 1-kilogram block of iron. It's all about how tightly packed the atoms are in each material.
Iron has a greater density.
Greater in what way? They both have the same mass. Aluminium, being less dense will have a greater volume, but being more abundant will have a smaller value.
Both are equal Depends if they weigh 1 kilogram where they are or one kilogram compared to Earth's gravitational pull. ~The kilogram technically does not measure weight, it measures mass. If all the items you mention have the same mass then the densest material (iron) has the greatest weight because it displaces the least volume of air. A balloon filled with one kilogram (around 5600 liters) of helium will float in the air. If you want to measure weight, the proper unit is the Newton.
Iron would require a higher amount of heat due to the fact that it is a metal and has stronger bonds than water does. Water is made up of hydrogen bonds which allow it to heat up quickly.
Since kilograms are the unit we use to measure mass, the answer is no: both have 1kg. of mass. :D
Iron has a greater density.
No, copper does not have more volume than iron for the same weight or mass. Copper is denser than iron, so a given mass of copper will have a smaller volume than the same mass of iron.
No, the density of a kilogram of iron is greater than the density of 1 gram of iron. Density is a measure of how much mass is contained in a given volume, so a kilogram of iron has much more mass in the same volume as 1 gram of iron, leading to a higher density.
No, the volume of a 2-kilogram iron brick would not be twice that of a 1-kilogram iron brick. The weight of an object does not directly correlate with its volume, as volume is determined by the dimensions and density of the object, not just its weight.
1 kg of lead has more volume And that's because lead is more dense than copper. A given volume of lead weighs more than that same volume of copper. It turns out that 1kg of something will weigh the same as 1kg of something else, though the two may have different volumes for that weight.
Not sure if this is a serious question but...A kilogram is a unit of mass, or in this case, weight.A kilogram is a kilogram.One kilogram of anything is a kilogram.1 kg of iron = 1 kg of wool.
Iron is more reactive than copper, so when iron is added to a copper sulfate solution, a single displacement reaction occurs where iron displaces copper from the copper sulfate, forming iron sulfate and copper. This is because iron has a greater ability to attract the sulfate ions compared to copper.
Iron has a higher mass than copper. Iron has a density of 7.87 g/cm3, while copper has a density of 8.96 g/cm3. Therefore, iron is more massive for the same volume compared to copper.
The weight of 1 kilogram of iron on Earth is greater than the weight of 1 kilogram of iron on the Moon. This is because weight depends on the gravitational pull of the celestial body, and Earth has a stronger gravitational force than the Moon.
Yes, iron is a stronger reducing agent than copper. This is because iron has a greater ability to lose electrons and be oxidized compared to copper. Iron readily donates electrons to other substances, making it more effective at reducing them.
Gold is denser than copper and iron. This is because the density of a material is determined by its mass per unit volume, and gold has a higher atomic mass than copper and iron, making it denser. So, 1kg of gold would occupy less volume compared to 1kg of copper or iron.
When compared by volume, copper is best, then aluminum and finally iron. When compared by weight, aluminum is better than copper. You have to compare by volume because aluminum is so much lighter than copper, an aluminum wire that weighed the same as a copper wire would be much bigger and harder to work with.