Because a triangle has 3 sides whereas a parallelogram has 4 sides
yes
2
There are normally no parallelograms within an isosceles triangle unless you put them there yourself.
No, parallelograms are specific to quadrilaterals (shapes with 4 sides).
The number of parallelograms that can fit into a hexagon depends on the size and orientation of the parallelograms relative to the hexagon. A regular hexagon can be divided into six equilateral triangles, and each triangle can accommodate a parallelogram, depending on its dimensions. In general, the maximum number of parallelograms that can fit into a hexagon can vary, but a common configuration is to fit two parallelograms in each triangular section, potentially allowing for a total of twelve parallelograms. However, this is contingent on the specific dimensions of the parallelograms used.
They are a miscellaneous collection of polygons.
Yes, all squares and rectangles are types of parallelograms since they have opposite sides that are equal and parallel. However, not all triangles are parallelograms, as triangles do not have opposite sides or angles. A parallelogram specifically requires four sides, while a triangle only has three.
A prism has a variety of bases but the sides are always parallelograms. A triangular prism has a triangle as the two bases and parallelograms as lateral sides. A pyramid has a variety of bases but the sides are triangles.
Nope, never. Parallelograms are classified as having 1 or 2 sets of parallel sides, not triangles.
Triangles have only three sides; all quadrilaterals, including parallelograms, have four.
Because parallelograms include rhombuses, squares, and rectangles, any triangle would be one of those split in two. If you are thinking about a parallelogram that cannot be classified any more specifically, then it would be a scalene triangle.
Any geometrical figure can have any area. Triangles can be constructed of any desired size, and so can parallelograms.