1.525 × 106 written in standard notation is 1,525,000
The set of X1, X2, ..., XN is called X. Given that mean(X), is the sum of all X divided by N, the variance of X is mean((Xi - mean(X))2). The standard deviation of X is the square root of the variance.
You use the z-transformation.For any variable X, with mean m and standard error s,Z = (X - m)/s is distributed as N(0, 1).You use the z-transformation.For any variable X, with mean m and standard error s,Z = (X - m)/s is distributed as N(0, 1).You use the z-transformation.For any variable X, with mean m and standard error s,Z = (X - m)/s is distributed as N(0, 1).You use the z-transformation.For any variable X, with mean m and standard error s,Z = (X - m)/s is distributed as N(0, 1).
The mean of a proportion, p, is X/n; where X is the number of instances & n is the sample size; and its standard deviation is sqrt[p(1-p)]
z = (x - u)/(standard dev)The z score expresses the difference of the experimental result x from the most probable result u as a number of standard deviations. The probability can then be calculated from the cumulative standard normal distribution. ie sigma(z)
no it is not possible because you have to take the square of error that is (x-X)2. the square of any number is always positive----------Improved answer:It is not possible to have a negative standard deviation because:SD (standard deviation) is equal to the square of V (variance).
5.8 × 106 written in standard notation is 5,800,000
5.37 106 in standard form is 5.37 x 106
1.4 x 106 written in standard notation is 1,400,000
8.916 106 (8.916 x 106) in standard form is 8,916,000
actually 2.75 x 106^6
6.07 x 106 in standard form is 6,070,000
3450000
2.0 × 106 written in regular notation is 2,000,000
2 x 106
6.199219 x 106.
Expressed in standard form, 455000 is equal to 4.55 x 106.
7 million in standard notation is 7.0 x 106