Suppose you plotted the same pairs of variables from two data sets on the same scattter plot, perhaps representing the two data sets in distinct colours. Then if the data sets differed sufficiently in standard deviation you would notice greater scatter or spread in one of them.
This would increase the mean by 6 points but would not change the standard deviation.
Your middle point or line for the plot (mean) would be 6.375. Then you would add/subtract 1.47 from your mean. For example, one standard deviation would equal 6.375 + 1.47 and one standard deviation from the left would be 6.375 - 1.47
Yes. For this to happen, the values would all have to be the same.
Yes. The standard deviation and mean would be less. How much less would depend on the sample size, the distribution that the sample was taken from (parent distribution) and the parameters of the parent distribution. The affect on the sampling distribution of the mean and standard deviation could easily be identified by Monte Carlo simulation.
The normal distribution would be a standard normal distribution if it had a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1.
The mean would be negative, but standard deviation is always positive.
It would be 3*5 = 15.
Standard deviation is a number and you would divide it in exactly the same way as you would divide any other number!
A large standard deviation means that the data were spread out. It is relative whether or not you consider a standard deviation to be "large" or not, but a larger standard deviation always means that the data is more spread out than a smaller one. For example, if the mean was 60, and the standard deviation was 1, then this is a small standard deviation. The data is not spread out and a score of 74 or 43 would be highly unlikely, almost impossible. However, if the mean was 60 and the standard deviation was 20, then this would be a large standard deviation. The data is spread out more and a score of 74 or 43 wouldn't be odd or unusual at all.
The standard deviation of a single value, such as 34, is not defined in the traditional sense because standard deviation measures the spread of a set of data points around their mean. If you have a dataset that consists solely of the number 34, the standard deviation would be 0, since there is no variation. However, if you're referring to a dataset that includes 34 along with other values, the standard deviation would depend on the entire dataset.
This would increase the mean by 6 points but would not change the standard deviation.
A standard deviation of zero means that all the data points are the same value.
There's no valid answer to your question. The problem is a standard deviation can be close to zero, but there is no upper limit. So, I can make a statement that if my standard deviation is much smaller than my mean, this indicates a low standard deviation. This is somewhat subjective. But I can't make say that if my standard deviation is many times the mean value, that would be considered high. It depends on the problem at hand.
Your middle point or line for the plot (mean) would be 6.375. Then you would add/subtract 1.47 from your mean. For example, one standard deviation would equal 6.375 + 1.47 and one standard deviation from the left would be 6.375 - 1.47
A standard deviation calculator allows the user to find the mean spread away from the mean in a statistical environment. Most users needing to find the standard deviation are in the statistics field. Usually, the data set will be given and must be typed into the calculator. The standard deviation calculator will then give the standard deviation of the data. In order to find the variance of the data, simply square the answer.
The standard deviation itself is a measure of variability or dispersion within a dataset, not a value that can be directly assigned to a single number like 2.5. If you have a dataset where 2.5 is a data point, you would need the entire dataset to calculate the standard deviation. However, if you are referring to a dataset where 2.5 is the mean and all values are the same (for example, all values are 2.5), then the standard deviation would be 0, since there is no variability.
The standard deviation, in itself, cannot be high nor low. If the same measurements were recorded using a unit that was a ten times as large (centimetres instead of millimetres), the standard deviation for exactly the same data set would be 1.8. And if they were recorded in metres the sd would be 0.018