answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Correlation by itself is understood not to be sufficient to conclude causation. That two variables change together in a highly correlated way could mean that changes in both variables are being controlled or caused by something altogether different that has not yet come to light or that has not been considered as the cause.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do historians need to distinguish between causation and correlation?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Statistics

How are correlation and causation similar?

both have connections between multiple events


What is the difinition of biostatistic study design?

Biostatistics is the branch of statistics responsible for the proper interpretation of scientific data generated in biology, public health and other health sciences. Biostatistics is particularly concerned with disentangling different sources of variation and seeks to distinguish between correlation and causation.


What is true about correlation?

It is a measure of the strength of a linear relationship between one dependent variable and one or more explanatory variables.It is very important to recognise that a high level of correlation does not imply causation. Also, it does not provide information on non-linear relationships.


Does a strong positive correlation prove causation?

A strong positive correlation does not prove causation. People only get sunburned during daylight hours. Sundials only work during daylight hours. Therefore sundials cause sunburns. The above sentences show how absurd such predicate thinking could be. Simply because two events usually occur at the same time does not mean they are related. One man found a perfect correlation between the price of whiskey and Chicago school teachers' salaries. No possible relationship could possibly exist except the rate of prosperity and inflation. Causation is difficult to prove.


What is the correlation coefficient of -2?

A serious error. The maximum magnitude for a correlation coefficient is 1.The Correlation coefficient is lies between -1 to 1 if it is 0 mean there is no correlation between them. Here they are given less than -1 value so it is not a value of correlation coefficient.

Related questions

The goal of the scientist is to design an experiment that will be able to distinguish the difference between?

Correlation and causation.


How do correlation and causation differ?

Correlation is when two things are related or have similar properties and they can exist independently. Causation means that one thing made the other thing happen.


What is the relationship between correlation and causation?

correlation implies the cause and effect relationship,, but casuality doesn't imply correlation.


What are some relationships that exist between variables?

Causation, correlation...


What are the three conditions necessary for causation between variables?

correlation, temporal priority, lack of spurious correlation


How are correlation and causation similar?

both have connections between multiple events


What is the difference between causation and correlation?

Correlation is when two things are related or have similar properties. They can exist independently. Causation means that one thing made the other thing happen


The goal of a scientist is to design an experiment that will be able to distinguish the difference between?

Correlation and causation.


What does correlation mean in maths?

Correlation is a statistical measure of the linear association between two variables. It is important to remember that correlation does not mean causation and also that the absence of correlation does not mean the two variables are unrelated.


What term do historians use when they discuss the relationship between to events in which one is the direct result of another?

Causation


What is the difference between cause and correlation?

Correlation means that two events are related. Causation means that one event caused another event to happen. Correlation isn't the same as causation.


What term do historians use when they discuss the relationship between two events in which one is the direct result of another?

Causation