Often a quick estimate is better. The population of a city for example. An exact answer would require a lot of time and money, and by the time you got your answer, people would have moved in or out, changing the exact answer.
Perhaps minute intervals might be better than minute intervals.
If you are receiving 07 percent is better than 06 If you are giving 06 percent is better than 07
No, M&M's are better because they contain chocolate.
They're not!
no a double bar graph is better
I don't know I have the exact same question try yahoo it might help its so much better than wiki answers
No, cowboys are not better than Indians, though some might believe they are. Of course, others might believe Indians are better than cowboys.
both because they are the same exact thing
It costs 4.10 which is obtained as "a little more than 4".The exact answer is 4.15
When you do not require an exact answer but an approximation is sufficient.
By one estimation, several hundred gallons of oil leaked into the lake. Estimation can often provide an approximate number, rather than an exact number.
No the Ratio of a mixture are not exact, one mixture might have more substance than the other but it is still a mixture.
it might have better training
It would grow better in water than soil because it would obsorbe the exact amount of water it needs.
dark chocolate is better than you even when you might think that it's nasty!
The practice of estimation comes with knowledge and experience. Gender is irrelevant. However, it does seem that math ability varies with the amount of testosterone present.
Your choiceIts really your choice because you might think that marmite is better than butter or butter is better than marmite!