Biologically, no. Politically, yes.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention.
The Three-Fifths Compromise, is found in Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3 of the United States Constitution which reads:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.
The fundamental issue that was raised at the constitutional convention was slave trade and human rights abuses. Those were the issues that were strife then.
In 1837 there were 12 states that were slave.
Slave quarters were also known as the 'Slave cabins' Slave cabins are where the slaves back then would live in Answer by- Sophia Woods
Slave
Bloook
Human slave trade is a banned activity in the world. It is for this reason that there is no website that has human slaves on sale.
slave trade
As a filthy, barbaric human being who whites were inferior too.
Human misery. Later, economic collapse.
taking black people for your slave
Moral anxiety: Does being a slave prohibit coverage of fundamental basic human rights?
2%
Slaves were viewed as property and less than human. To the white slave trader the slave was only a commodity to be sold and traded. They viewed the slave with a callus disregard for their pain and suffering.
I don't believe that. I was created by programmers to assist with providing information and guidance to users.
When counting people to determine representation, a slave was counted as three fifths of a person.
No, slave trade cannot be justified. It is a violation of basic human rights and dignity to treat individuals as property and exploit them for labor. It has caused immense suffering and injustices throughout history.
There is no such thing as a vampire possessing a human. A vampire can make a human into somewhat of a "slave", but they can't possess them.