160 and 189 are relatively prime as they have no common factors other than 1.
The prime numbers (factors) of 189 are: 3 and 7
They are: 333*7 = 189
No, they are not relatively prime.
It can be. 26 is relatively prime to 27. 26 is not relatively prime to 34.
25 is relatively prime with 36. 25 is not relatively prime with 35.
80 and 189 are relatively prime as they have no common factors other than 1.
Both are not prime numbers, but they are relatively prime.
They are coprime or relatively prime, having a GCF of 1.
The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7
No. 189 is not prime because it is divisible by 9.
The prime numbers (factors) of 189 are: 3 and 7
They are: 333*7 = 189
Neither 189 nor 1500 are prime factors.
The factors of 189 are the numbers that can be multiplied together to give 189. The factors of 189 are 1, 3, 7, 9, 21, 27, 63, and 189. The prime factors of 189 are the prime numbers that can be multiplied together to give 189. The prime factors of 189 are 3 and 7.
It is: 3*3*3*7 = 189
They are: 3*3*3*7 = 189
It is composite because 189=3x3x3x7