160 and 189 are relatively prime as they have no common factors other than 1.
The prime numbers (factors) of 189 are: 3 and 7
They are: 333*7 = 189
189 = 33 × 7
33 x 7 = 189
No, they are not relatively prime.
80 and 189 are relatively prime as they have no common factors other than 1.
Both are not prime numbers, but they are relatively prime.
They are coprime or relatively prime, having a GCF of 1.
The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7
No. 189 is not prime because it is divisible by 9.
The prime numbers (factors) of 189 are: 3 and 7
The common factor of the numbers 189 and 200 is 1, as they are relatively prime; they do not share any other positive integer factors besides 1. The prime factorization of 189 is (3^3 \times 7), and for 200, it is (2^3 \times 5^2). Since they have no prime factors in common, their only common factor is 1.
They are: 333*7 = 189
Neither 189 nor 1500 are prime factors.
189 is a composite number because it has factors other than 1 and itself. It is not a prime number.The 8 factors of 189 are 1, 3, 7, 9, 21, 27, 63, and 189.The factor pairs of 189 are 1 x 189, 3 x 63, 7 x 27, and 9 x 21.The proper factors of 189 are 1, 3, 7, 9, 21, 27, and 63 or,if the definition you are using excludes 1, they are 3, 7, 9, 21, 27, and 63.The prime factors of 189 are 3, 3, 3, and 7. Note: There is repetition of these factors, so if the prime factors are being listed instead of the prime factorization, usually only the distinct prime factors are listed.The distinct prime factors of 189 are 3 and 7.The prime factorization of 189 is 3 x 3 x 3 x 7 or, in exponential form, 33 x 7.33 x 7 = 189.
It is: 3*3*3*7 = 189
They are: 3*3*3*7 = 189