160 and 189 are relatively prime as they have no common factors other than 1.
The prime numbers (factors) of 189 are: 3 and 7
They are: 333*7 = 189
No, they are not relatively prime.
It can be. 26 is relatively prime to 27. 26 is not relatively prime to 34.
25 is relatively prime with 36. 25 is not relatively prime with 35.
80 and 189 are relatively prime as they have no common factors other than 1.
Both are not prime numbers, but they are relatively prime.
They are coprime or relatively prime, having a GCF of 1.
The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7The prime factorisation (not fractional!) of 189 is:189 = 3*3*3*7
No. 189 is not prime because it is divisible by 9.
The prime numbers (factors) of 189 are: 3 and 7
They are: 333*7 = 189
Neither 189 nor 1500 are prime factors.
It is composite because 189=3x3x3x7
They are: 3*3*3*7 = 189
It is: 3*3*3*7 = 189
Its prime factors are 3 and 7.3 x 3 x 3 x 7 = 189