answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

319=(11)(29)

450=2(32) (52 )

So they have no common factors and are relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

โˆ™ 2010-06-13 06:03:46
This answer is:
๐Ÿ™
0
๐Ÿคจ
0
๐Ÿ˜ฎ
0
User Avatar
Study guides

Factoring and Multiples

21 cards

What is the prime factorization of 24

What is the prime factorization of 54

What is the prime factorization of 64

What is the prime factorization of 34

โžก๏ธ
See all cards
4.8
โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…
5 Reviews

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Are 319 and 450 relatively prime?
Write your answer...
Submit
Related questions

Are 180 and 168 and 450 relatively prime?

A set of even numbers cannot be relatively prime. They are all divisible by 2.


Are 168 180 and 450 relatively prime?

A set of even numbers cannot be relatively prime. They are all divisible by 2.


Are 450 and 741 relatively prime?

No, because 1 is not their only common factor.


Is 319 prime?

No.


What is the prime factorization of 319?

319 = 11 * 29


Are 27 and 117 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Is 34 relatively prime?

It can be. 34 is relatively prime to 35. 34 is not relatively prime to 40.


Is 26 relatively prime?

It can be. 26 is relatively prime to 27. 26 is not relatively prime to 34.


Is 25 a relatively prime?

25 is relatively prime with 36. 25 is not relatively prime with 35.


Is 319 a prime number?

No. 11 and 29 are factors of 319 apart from 1 and 319 and hence it is a normal/composite number


Is 70 and 195 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Are 52 and 143 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Are 16 and 20 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Is 92 and 274 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Are 58 and 60 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Are 101 and 505 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Is 32 and 76 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Are 42 and 66 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Is 38 and 48 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Is 42 and 105 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Are 66 and 42 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Are 20 and 76 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Are 144 and 4 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Are 13 and 52 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Are 49 and 770 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.