No, because 1 is not their only common factor.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
319=(11)(29) 450=2(32) (52 ) So they have no common factors and are relatively prime.
A set of even numbers cannot be relatively prime. They are all divisible by 2.
741 results from the following multiplications of two numbers: 1 * 741 (1 is not prime) 3 * 247 (247 is not prime) 13 * 57 (57 is not prime) 19 * 39 (39 is not prime) There are no two prime numbers that when multiplied equal 741. 3 * 13 * 19 equals 741, and all three of those numbers are prime.
No, it is a composite.
Oh, dude, you're hitting me with the prime number question! So, technically, 741 is not a prime number because it can be divided by numbers other than 1 and itself. It's like inviting more people to the party than just you and your bestie. So yeah, 741 is not in the exclusive prime number club.
Composite.
The factors are: 1, 3, 13, 19, 39, 57, 247, 741 The prime factorisation is 3 x 13 x 19
Yes, 741 is a composite number. Its prime factorisation is: 3 x 13 x 19.
450 is not prime. 450 = 2 * 3 * 3 * 5 * 5
No, they are not relatively prime.
It can be. 34 is relatively prime to 35. 34 is not relatively prime to 40.
It can be. 26 is relatively prime to 27. 26 is not relatively prime to 34.