No. If the vector is 2D then it's magnitude is (x^2+y^2)^0.5 where x and y are the components and ^0.5 means take the square root. In 3D this becomes (x^2+y^2+z^2)^0.5 etc. Thus the magnitude is always at least as big as one of the components.
Here's an example of a 3D vector: (3,4,5)
|(3,4,5)|=(3^2+4^2+5^2)^0.5=(9+16+25)^0.5=50^0.5=7.07...
If y and z were 0: (3,0,0)
|(3,0,0)|=(3^2+0^2+0^2)^0.5=(9+0+0)^0.5=9^0.5=3 ie the magnitude is the same size as x.
You can also consider this geometrically. A vector is an arrow and the magnitude represents the length of the arrow. Vector addition is the 'adding' of these arrows so (3,4,5)=(3,0,0)+(0,4,0)+(0,0,5). Clearly the length of an arrow built of three smaller ones can't be less than any one of them.
no a vector cannot have a component greater than the magnitude of vector
No.
No a vector may not have a component greater than its magnitude. When dealing with highschool phyics problems, the magnitude is usually the sum of two or more components and one component will offset the other, causing the magnitude to be less then its component
The resultant vector IS the sum of the individual vectors. Its magnitudecan be the sum of their individual magnitudes or less, but not greater.
No.
can a vector have a component greater than the vector magnitude
No.
no a vector cannot have a component greater than the magnitude of vector
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No a vector may not have a component greater than its magnitude. When dealing with highschool phyics problems, the magnitude is usually the sum of two or more components and one component will offset the other, causing the magnitude to be less then its component
The resultant vector IS the sum of the individual vectors. Its magnitudecan be the sum of their individual magnitudes or less, but not greater.