YES
One problem with geometry, is that most people learn Euclidean geometry. It is intuitive but his parallel postulate creates great problems for mathematicians. It can neither be proved or disproved. There are consistent geometries if you accept that postulate, but there are equally consistent geometries for the two possible negations (no parallel lines and many). Artists are not necessarily constrained by geometric "realities" or restrictions. And many have either used geometry or ignored it to great effect. For example, many renaissance artists used projective geometry and the idea of a vanishing point in their art. This gave their work a better 3-d perspective than earlier works which often looked flat. Images in the background used to be unrealistically large and so on. In the 20th century, artists like MC Escher played on geometry, perspective, tessellation (tiling). Finally, many cubists chose not to use "normal" geometry, but chose to simultaneously portray things from several perspectives at the same time.
For reasons similar to those which explain why mathematicians accept the definition of zero as a number. It provides an identity for unions of sets, provides for closure of sets under taking complements.
Accept
abilty to accept ideas
dien
to accept something
To accept
Accept it and move on.
plagiarism
It depends on what precisely the question is. Also, we are severely restricted by limitations of the browser which is used for answering. It will not accept most symbols and graphics are impossible.
No one has to accept another for whatever reason they please, but since nonacceptance works both ways, no one has to accept your opinions as their own nor do they have to accept you if they believe you are too intolerant.
accept as your own; choose, select