0
Try a vector approach.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How would you prove that an inequality does have the same solution that an equation would have?
If you're given the inequality and the equation, then the way to prove that they have the same solution is to solve each one and show that the solutions are the same number. Don't strain yourself, though. An inequality and an equation never have the same solution.
How do you prove the diagonal lines in a parallelogram is not a rhombus?
Because the diagonals of a rhombus intersect each other at 90 degrees whereas in a parallelogram they don't
What are not is efficient to prove that a quadrilateral is a parallelogram?
A parallelogram is a quadrilateral because it has 4 sides and all quadrilaterals have 4 sides such as a square, a rectangle, a rhombus ... etc
How can you used a triangle to prove quadrilateral is a parallelogram?
A quadrilateral, in general, is not a parallelogram. If it is a parallelogram then you will have some additional information about its sides and angles. If you do not have such information it is not possible to prove that it is a parallelogram. Draw a diagonal which will divide the quadrilateral into two triangles and use the additional information that you have to show that the triangles are congruent. This can then be used to show equality of sides or of angles: the latter can then be used to show that sides are parallel. Note that the choice of which diagonal may influence how (if at all) you proceed.
What does a rhombus have to have to prove that it is a rhombus?
a parallelogram with opposite equal acute angles, opposite equal obtuse angles, and four equal sides.
What is the ways to prove that a quadrilateral is a parallelogram?
If it is a parallelogram, then it has two sets of parallelogram sides. Parallelograms' opposite angles are congruent A parallelogram's bisectors are congruent. * * * * * A parallelogram's bisectors are NOT congruent.
Which of the following will not prove that quadrilateral MNOP is a parallelogram?
Which of the following is a valid reason why the quadrilateral shown below is a parallelogram?
How do you prove that a parallelogram is a rectangle?
a rectangle has four right angles and opposite sides are all the same length This means that a parallelogram is not always a rectangle, but a rectangle is always a parallelogram, by definition.
What are the proofs that a quadrilateral ia s parallelogram?
There are 5 ways to prove a Quadrilateral is a Parallelogram. -Prove both pairs of opposite sides congruent -Prove both pairs of opposite sides parallel -Prove one pair of opposite sides both congruent and parallel -Prove both pairs of opposite angles are congruent -Prove that the diagonals bisect each other
How would you prove that an inequality does have the same solution that an equation would have?
If you're given the inequality and the equation, then the way to prove that they have the same solution is to solve each one and show that the solutions are the same number. Don't strain yourself, though. An inequality and an equation never have the same solution.
How do you prove the diagonal lines in a parallelogram is not a rhombus?
Because the diagonals of a rhombus intersect each other at 90 degrees whereas in a parallelogram they don't
What are not is efficient to prove that a quadrilateral is a parallelogram?
A parallelogram is a quadrilateral because it has 4 sides and all quadrilaterals have 4 sides such as a square, a rectangle, a rhombus ... etc
How wold you use a midpoint formula to prove that a quadrilateral is a parallelogram?
I can use it when lines are joined together
How can i prove that a parallelogram is a parallelogram when you are given opposite sides are congruent?
If two opposite sides are congruent in length and direction then they are parallel sides. THat would mean the other two sides are congruent making 4 parallel sides or a parallelogram
How can you used a triangle to prove quadrilateral is a parallelogram?
A quadrilateral, in general, is not a parallelogram. If it is a parallelogram then you will have some additional information about its sides and angles. If you do not have such information it is not possible to prove that it is a parallelogram. Draw a diagonal which will divide the quadrilateral into two triangles and use the additional information that you have to show that the triangles are congruent. This can then be used to show equality of sides or of angles: the latter can then be used to show that sides are parallel. Note that the choice of which diagonal may influence how (if at all) you proceed.
Prove that if the diagonal of a parallelogram does not bisect the angles through the vertices to which the diagonal is drawn the parallelogram is not a rhombus?
Suppose that the parallelogram is a rhombus (a parallelogram with equal sides). If we draw the diagonals, isosceles triangles are formed (where the median is also an angle bisector and perpendicular to the base). Since the diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other, and the diagonals don't bisect the vertex angles where they are drawn, then the parallelogram is not a rhombus.
How do you prove that diagonal of a parallelogram divide it into two congruent triangles?
maths mental abuse to human s
