answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

I will outline a way to prove it for you. I will also five a simple vector proof for those that have studied vectors. For the first proof, one can often cite some of these as known facts or refer to theorems in a text. 1. First show that a rhombus is a parallelogram 2. Next, using the above, show that diagonals of the rhombus divide it into 4 congruent triangles. 3. Last, use CPCTC and not that all 4 middle angles are congruent so that are 90 degrees. From this is is easy to say that the diagonals are perpendicular. Hints. to prove 1, use the fact that all 4 sides of the rhombus are congruent and then use SSS to find two congruent triangles. Then use CPCTC to show that the angles are the same and find a transversal. Look at same side interior angles cut by that transversal and say something about them being parallel. 2. Use SSS again and find 4 congruent triangles and look at the diagonals. I will help more by giving you another proof using vectors that is really much more straightforward. A rhombus is a quadrilateral with all sides having equal length. This means that if two vectors, a and b that form the corner of a rhombus, then the magnitude of a and b are equal The diagonals of the parallelogram are precisely a+b and a-b. Now look at the dot product of a+b and a-b and see that it is zero and remember that a dot product of zero means the vectors are perpendicular or orthogonal The first part is a pure synthetic geometry approach and if anyone need more help to finish that, just ask, The second part is a vector proof which is elegant because it is so simple.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do you prove that the diagonals in a rhombus are perpendicular to each other?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why are the diagonals of a square perpendicular bisectors of each other?

You could prove this by congruent triangles, but here are two simpler arguments: --------------- Since a square is a rhombus, and the diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular bisectors of each other, then the diagonals of a square must be perpendicular bisectors of each other -------------------- A square has four-fold rotational symmetry - as you rotate it around the point where the diagonals cross, there are four positions in which it looks the same. This means that the four angles at the centre must be equal. They will each measure 360/4 = 90 degrees, so the diagonals are perpendicular. Also. the four segments joining the centre to a vertex are all equal, so the diagonals bisect each other.


Prove that if the diagonal of a parallelogram does not bisect the angles through the vertices to which the diagonal is drawn the parallelogram is not a rhombus?

Suppose that the parallelogram is a rhombus (a parallelogram with equal sides). If we draw the diagonals, isosceles triangles are formed (where the median is also an angle bisector and perpendicular to the base). Since the diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other, and the diagonals don't bisect the vertex angles where they are drawn, then the parallelogram is not a rhombus.


Prove that a rhombus has congruent diagonals?

Since the diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular between them, then in one forth part of the rhombus they form a right triangle where hypotenuse is the side of the rhombus, the base and the height are one half part of its diagonals. Let's take a look at this right triangle.The base and the height lengths could be congruent if and only if the angles opposite to them have a measure of 45⁰, which is impossible to a rhombus because these angles have different measures as they are one half of the two adjacent angles of the rhombus (the diagonals of a rhombus bisect the vertex angles from where they are drawn), which also have different measures (their sum is 180⁰ ).Therefore, the diagonals of a rhombus are not congruent as their one half are not (the diagonals of a rhombus bisect each other).


How do you prove the diagonal lines in a parallelogram is not a rhombus?

Because the diagonals of a rhombus intersect each other at 90 degrees whereas in a parallelogram they don't


Show that if diagonals of a quadrilateral bisects each other then it is a rhombus?

This cannot be proven, because it is not generally true. If the diagonals of a quadrilateral bisect each other, then it is a parallelogram. And conversely, the diagonals of any parallelogram bisect each other. However not every parallelogram is a rhombus.However, if the diagonals are perpendicular bisectors, then we have a rhombus.Consider quadrilateral ABCD, with diagonals intersecting at X, whereAC and BD are perpendicular;AX=XC;BX=XD.Then angles AXB, BXC, CXD, DXA are all right angles and are congruent.By the ASA theorem, triangles AXB, BXC, CXD and DXA are all congruent.This means that AB=BC=CD=DA.Since the sides of the quadrilateral ABCD are congruent, it is a rhombus.


What is the difference between a rhombus and a square?

The difference is a rhombus is made up of 2 acute and 2 obtuse angles and a square is made up of 4 right angles. On a square, both of the diagonals equal each other, but on a rhombus the diagonals can equal each other, but it's possible for them to not equal each other.


How can you prove a shape is a rhombus?

A rhombus has two sets of parrallell sides. If it has two set of parrellell sides, it is a rhombus.


Prove that the diagonals of rectangle are equal?

prove any two adjacent triangles as congruent


Are adjacent sides of a rhombus always congruent?

Yes, it is one of the ways to prove a figure is a rhombus. If adjacent sides are congruent, then the figure is a rhombus.


How do you prove the diagonals of an isosceles triangle congruent?

You can't because triangles do not have diagonals but an isosceles triangle has 2 equal sides


What is the different beteew sqaures and rhombus?

A square is a rhombus with a right angle (90 degrees) at one corner.Note:That means that all four angles will be right angles, but in order to prove thatyour rhombus is a square, it's only necessary to prove that one angle is.


What are necessary when proving that the diagonals of a rectangle are congruent?

A ruler or a compass would help or aternatively use Pythagoras' theorem to prove that the diagonals are of equal lengths