Same as you would with a normal equation except that when you multiply or divide by a negative number, the sign changes.
e.g. [diving across by -2]
-2x = 4
x = 4/-2
x = -2
-2x > 4
x < 4/-2
x < -2
624
There is always going to be gender inequality in the work place because men and women will always be different creatures.
Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.
"x281" is an expression, not an inequality. An inequality is supposed to have an inequality sign, such as "<" or ">".
There is no inequality since there is no inequality sign.
algebraic inequality, is an inequality that contains at least one variable.
The inequality is maintained with the direction of the inequality unchanged.
Inequality is a noun.
There is no inequality in the question.
Income inequality can lead to increased motivation and competition, which can drive innovation and economic growth. It can also incentivize individuals to work harder and strive for success. Additionally, income inequality can create opportunities for social mobility and provide a diverse range of goods and services in the market.
Functionalists believe that social inequality is necessary for a balanced society. This is because individuals must fill both the low pay jobs and the high pay jobs. Not everyone can be a "boss", but through social inequality, it forces people to work harder to "climb" the success ladder.
x3 6x2-x-30