0
With an indirect proof, you temporarily assume that the opposite of what you're trying to prove is true. For example, let's say I'm trying to prove that the sky is blue. With an indirect proof, I would first say: "Assume temporarily that sky is not blue..." and go from there. Eventually, I will reach a contradiction and with this contradiction I can assume that this route of thinking is false, therefore my proof must be true.
What else can I help you with?
What term defined as anything that can distort data and lead to inaccurate conclusion?
error
What does the analysis of data lead to?
It leads to the result.AnswerNot always. Sometimes it leads you to confusion.
Which sample size out of a population of 1000 is most likely to lead to a valid conclusion?
Providing of course that a sample is representative of the population from which it is drawn, the bigger it is the more likely it will be to lead to a valid conclusion. Therefore, the best sample size when there are no restrictions, as in this case, would be one of 1000.
Where in the old testament is the quotation Matthew 17 10?
Any 'Study Bible' will lead you to your desired answer found in Malachi 4:5-6.
How can you explain the significance level of at statistics?
Significance Level (Alpha Level): If the level is set a .05, it means the statistician is acknowledging that there is a 5% chance the results of the findings will lead them to an incorrect conclusion.
What is indirect approach?
The indirect approach is a communication strategy that involves presenting information in a roundabout or subtle way rather than directly stating it. This approach is often used to soften negative feedback, address sensitive topics, or persuade others without being confrontational. It can involve using questions, stories, analogies, or examples to lead the audience to a desired conclusion.
When you begin an indirect proof do you assume the inverse of what you intend to prove is true?
Yes, that's how it is done. Assuming the contrary should eventually lead you to some contradiction.
What does data analysis lead to?
Conclusion
What is antidotal?
A grammatical mistake. It is meant to say "anecdotal evidence" which is evidence that may be true but could be unreliable and may or may not lead to the desired conclusion. It is as opposed to "scientific evidence" which may be held as reliable.
Can a valid argument lead to a false conclusion?
Yes, a valid argument can lead to a false conclusion if the premises are true but the reasoning process is flawed.
What is antidotal evidence?
A grammatical mistake. It is meant to say "anecdotal evidence" which is evidence that may be true but could be unreliable and may or may not lead to the desired conclusion. It is as opposed to "scientific evidence" which may be held as reliable.
What does Finding an answer to a question often lead to?
a conclusion/result
What value of 'r' do I need to achieve the desired outcome?
To achieve the desired outcome, you need to determine the specific value of 'r' that will lead to the desired result.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. - Valid arguments are deductive. - Arguments are valid if the premises lead to the conclusion without committing a fallacy. - If an argument is valid, that means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. - This means that a valid argument with a false premise can lead to a false conclusion. This is called a valid, unsound argument. - A valid, sound argument would be when, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true and the premises are true.
What is scientific investigation?
A scientific observation is data , a hypothesis , and well a conclusion. Your observing or testing something that can lead you to your conclusion
What term defined as anything that can distort data and lead to inaccurate conclusion?
error
What mistake is the reason that lead to an invalid conclusion?
One mistake that can lead to an invalid conclusion is using faulty logic, such as making hasty generalizations or relying on anecdotal evidence. It's important to ensure that the reasoning process is sound and based on reliable information and logical arguments to reach a valid conclusion.
