50
In positive numbers, 75 of anything, even hundredths, is larger than 70 of the same thing.
Consecutive even numbers that sum to thirty-eight (38) are eighteen (18) and twenty (20). Twenty (20) is larger than eighteen (18).
No. As a general rule, factors cannot be larger than the numbers they are compared to.
No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.
No, 0.25 is greater than 0. All numbers that are not negative are larger than 0, even if they have a decimal.
Mixed numbers are larger than proper fractions.
4,6,8,10
Yes, rational numbers are larger than integer because integers are part of rational numbers.
The number of digits required to store a number in binary is substantially greater than that required in octal and even larger than in hex.
Five numbers larger than 1,000,885 are 1,000,886, 1,000,887, 1,000,888, 1,000,889, and 1,000,890.
In a certain sense, the set of complex numbers is "larger" than the set of real numbers, since the set of real numbers is a proper subset of it.
Several hundreds of millions of times larger in volume, if not even larger.