0
What else can I help you with?
Why is 0.75 larger than 0.7?
In positive numbers, 75 of anything, even hundredths, is larger than 70 of the same thing.
The sum ot two consecutive even numbers is 38 What is the larger number?
Consecutive even numbers that sum to thirty-eight (38) are eighteen (18) and twenty (20). Twenty (20) is larger than eighteen (18).
Is Newcastle bigger than Glasgow?
No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.No. Glasgow is much larger than Newcastle.
Is 6 a factor of 81?
No. As a general rule, factors cannot be larger than the numbers they are compared to.
Are fractions with whole numbers larger than a regular fraction?
Mixed numbers are larger than proper fractions.
Is 0.25 less than 0?
No, 0.25 is greater than 0. All numbers that are not negative are larger than 0, even if they have a decimal.
Find 4 consecutive even integers where the product of the smaller two numbers is 56 less than the product of the two larger numbers?
4,6,8,10
Is the set of rational numbers is larger than the set of integers?
Yes, rational numbers are larger than integer because integers are part of rational numbers.
Why are octal and hexadecimal numbers preferred over binary numbers?
The number of digits required to store a number in binary is substantially greater than that required in octal and even larger than in hex.
What is A set of numbers that is larger than the set of real numbers?
In a certain sense, the set of complex numbers is "larger" than the set of real numbers, since the set of real numbers is a proper subset of it.
How much bigger is a fetus than when it started as an egg cell?
Several hundreds of millions of times larger in volume, if not even larger.
Does the set of whole numbers is larger than the set of natural numbers?
If you mean larger by "the set of whole numbers strictly contains the set of natural numbers", then yes, but if you mean "the set of whole numbers has a larger cardinality (size) than the set of natural numbers", then no, they have the same size.
