23 and 25 and many others.
As 13 is prime and is not a factor of 24, then they are relatively prime
Yes, they are relatively prime.
[p;]
In number theory, two integers a and b are said to be relatively prime, mutually prime, or coprime (also spelled co-prime) if the only positive integer that evenly divides both of them is 1. That is, the only common positive factor of the two numbers is 1.
Numbers whose GCF is 1, like 24 and 49, are known as relatively prime. This means that they have no prime factors in common.
Numbers having no common positive divisors other than one are relatively prime. In other words, the greatest common denominator of the numbers is one. Example: 24 and 25 are relatively prime.
No. they both share a factor of 2.
Two numbers which are "relatively prime" have no common prime factors. To illustrate, let's write several numbers in terms of their prime factors: 24 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 25 = 5 x 5 42 = 2 x 3 x 7 70 = 2 x 5 x 7 You can see that 24 and 25 are relatively prime, because they don't share any common prime factors. Likewise, 25 and 42 are relatively prime. 24 and 42, however, are NOT relatively prime because they share the common factors of 2 and 3. Likewise 25 and 70 are NOT relatively prime because they share the common factor 5. When a fraction is in its simplest form, the numerator and denominator are relatively prime.
13 and 24 are relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
Numbers are relatively prime if the only factor they have in common is 1. The factors of 48 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 48. The factors of 49 are 1, 7, and 49. The only common factor is 1. Therefore, 48 and 49 are relatively prime. Also, any two numbers whose difference is 1 are always relatively prime.
Yes, 24 and 77 are relatively prime.