no three is not a Prime number
Yes, they are relatively prime.
No, 57 and 96 are not relatively prime because they share a common factor of 3.
A number cannot be "relatively prime" except in relation to another number. For example, 8 and 15 are relatively primebecause they contain no prime factors in common.
Yes, e.g. 3 and 5 are relatively prime, 27 (33) and 25 (52) are relatively prime...
Yes. In general, if you have two different prime numbers, they will also be relatively prime.
No, they are not.
3.
They are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be the number 1. Both also have the number 3 as a common factor, so they are not relatively prime.
no three is not a prime number
They are both prime numbers
Yes, 3 and 20 are relatively prime because they have no common factor greater than 1.
No, 30 and 36 are not relatively prime. They share the factors 3 and 6.