no
Yes!
62 is not a prime number. It is composite. 62=2*31
62 is not a prime number and you cannot get a relitavely prime number it either is a prime number or it isnt a prime number! The definition of a prime number is a number that can only be divided b itself and one. No other number 62 can be divided by 2 as well as itself and 1 so NO IT IS NOT A PRIME NUMBER even numbers tend not to be prime numbers because they can be divided by two the only even number that is prime is 2 because it can only be divided by itself and 1 I hope this helped!
No, they are not relatively prime.
Yes, 62 and 121 are relatively prime
no
Yes, 55 and 62 are relatively prime because they have no common factor greater than 1.
No.
Yes!
The question is incomplete. A single number cannot be relatively prime. Two numbers are relatively prime *to each other* if their only common factor is 1, such as the numbers 21 and 11. A similar question would be "How far is it to London?" You need to know the other piece of information such as "From where?" Now, 62 is going to be relatively prime to many numbers, since it only has factors of 2 and 31, so all odd numbers that are not multiples of 31 are going to be relatively prime to 62.
62 is not a prime number. It is composite. 62=2*31
62 = 2 * 31The prime factorization of 62 is 2 x 31.
62 is not a prime number and you cannot get a relitavely prime number it either is a prime number or it isnt a prime number! The definition of a prime number is a number that can only be divided b itself and one. No other number 62 can be divided by 2 as well as itself and 1 so NO IT IS NOT A PRIME NUMBER even numbers tend not to be prime numbers because they can be divided by two the only even number that is prime is 2 because it can only be divided by itself and 1 I hope this helped!
No, they are not relatively prime.
It can be. 34 is relatively prime to 35. 34 is not relatively prime to 40.
25 is relatively prime with 36. 25 is not relatively prime with 35.