Best Answer

The question is incomplete. A single number cannot be relatively prime. Two numbers are relatively prime *to each other* if their only common factor is 1, such as the numbers 21 and 11.

A similar question would be "How far is it to London?" You need to know the other piece of information such as "From where?"

Now, 62 is going to be relatively prime to many numbers, since it only has factors of 2 and 31, so all odd numbers that are not multiples of 31 are going to be relatively prime to 62.

🙏

🤨

😮

Study guides

☆☆

Q: Is 62 relatively prime

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Related questions

Yes, 62 and 121 are relatively prime

3.

no

Yes, 55 and 62 are relatively prime because they have no common factor greater than 1.

Yes!

No.

No, they are not relatively prime.

It can be. 34 is relatively prime to 35. 34 is not relatively prime to 40.

It can be. 26 is relatively prime to 27. 26 is not relatively prime to 34.

25 is relatively prime with 36. 25 is not relatively prime with 35.

62 is not a prime number. It is composite. 62=2*31

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.