No.
It is not the distributive property. The statement in the question is simply FALSE.
The distributive property need not have any k in it.
no; commutative
3(7 + 2) = 3x7 + 3x2 is an example of the distributive law.The distributive law connects multiplication and addition.
distributive
0.4*(7.5 + 40) = 19
6(2 + 1) = 18==========
The distributive property of multiplication over addition and the identity property of multiplication. RS + RS = 1*RS + 1*RS (using identity property) = (1 + 1)*RS (using distributive property) = 2*RS
Distributive.
The distributive property of multiplication over addition.
The property of the number 1 as the multiplicative identity for numbers.
It's the Identity property