No.
It is not the distributive property. The statement in the question is simply FALSE.
The distributive property need not have any k in it.
no; commutative
0.4*(7.5 + 40) = 19
One example of a distributive property equation that equals 26 is (2(10 + 3) = 26). Here, you distribute the 2 to both terms inside the parentheses: (2 \times 10 + 2 \times 3), which simplifies to (20 + 6 = 26).
The distributive property states that when you multiply a number by a sum, you can distribute the multiplication to each addend. For example, 4 times 15 can be expressed as 4 times (10 + 5). Using the distributive property, this equals 4 times 10 plus 4 times 5, which is 40 + 20, resulting in 60.
3(7 + 2) = 3x7 + 3x2 is an example of the distributive law.The distributive law connects multiplication and addition.
distributive
6(2 + 1) = 18==========
In the distributive property, we distribute the multiplication operation over addition or subtraction within parentheses. In this case, we have (7x5) (7x2). By applying the distributive property, we can simplify this expression as 7*(5+2), which equals 7*7. Therefore, the result of (7x5) (7x2) in distributive property is 49.
The distributive property of multiplication over addition and the identity property of multiplication. RS + RS = 1*RS + 1*RS (using identity property) = (1 + 1)*RS (using distributive property) = 2*RS
To find the product of 7 and 63 using the distributive property, you can break down 63 into more manageable parts. For example, you can express 63 as 60 + 3. Then, apply the distributive property: (7 \times 63 = 7 \times (60 + 3) = 7 \times 60 + 7 \times 3). This simplifies to (420 + 21), which equals 441.