No. Integers are whole numbers and do not have any fraction or decimal part.
NO, it is a rational number but NOT an integer.
You get another integer that will take the sign from the larger of the two integers that were combined.
1/3 is not an integer, and there is no such thing as an interger. An integer is a whole number.
No, to be an integer it would have to be a whole number.
A rational number is one that can be expressed as one integer (whole number) over another integer. 4.89 = 489 ÷ 100 = 489/100 In this form 489 is an integer and 100 is an integer, so 4.89 can be expressed as one integer over another integer, thus it is a rational number.
allowed the slave states to count a slave as three-fifths of a person
When one of the multiplicands is an integer!
NO, it is a rational number but NOT an integer.
You get another integer that will take the sign from the larger of the two integers that were combined.
1/3 is not an integer, and there is no such thing as an interger. An integer is a whole number.
No, one half which is 1/2 is not a integer. Its a rational number.
No, to be an integer it would have to be a whole number.
There is no greatest integer. Whatever integer you think is greatest, you can always add one (1) to it and get a larger one.
A rational number is one that can be expressed as one integer (whole number) over another integer. 4.89 = 489 ÷ 100 = 489/100 In this form 489 is an integer and 100 is an integer, so 4.89 can be expressed as one integer over another integer, thus it is a rational number.
No. For any integer, you can add one to get an even greater integer.
Not at all. Six times one half is three, and one half is not an integer.
A rational number is one which can be expressed as one integer over another (possibly the same) integer which is not zero. thirty thirds = 30/3 which is one integer over another integer → it is rational.