Utilitarianism
The utilitarianism* movement.
the Utilitarians they said - something is morally right when the maximum amount of happiness is produced for the greatest amount of people
This phrase refers to the ethical principle of utilitarianism, which suggests that actions or decisions should aim to produce the greatest amount of happiness for the largest number of people. It emphasizes the importance of maximizing overall well-being and minimizing suffering in society as a whole.
This principle, often associated with utilitarianism, suggests that decisions should be made to maximize overall happiness or well-being among the majority of people in a society. It is a way of measuring the ethical consequences of actions by considering how they will affect the larger population's overall happiness or welfare.
The greatest happiness principle, as proposed by utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham, states that actions are ethical when they promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. It suggests that the moral worth of an action is determined by its ability to maximize overall happiness and minimize pain or suffering.
No, 23700 is not the greatest number. Clearly, 23701 is greater and it is also a number.
This phrase is associated with the philosopher Jeremy Bentham, who is known for advocating for utilitarianism, a moral theory that promotes actions that maximize overall happiness and well-being for the greatest number of people.
what is the greatest or least from the number line negative or greater
Sure there are greater numbers. For example, 4 is greater than 3. If you mean "... no greatest number", the reason is that you can always add one more, and get a number that is even greater. Thus, for example, 10 is not the greatest number, because you can add one and get 11. 11 is not the greatest number either, because you can add one and get 12. Etc.
0.62 is the greater number of the two.
0.101 is greater.