0
What are 19 and 1999 in roman numerals if they are not XIX and MCMXCIX respectively giving satisfactory reasons why not?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
It's generally acceptable to use VIIII in place of IX, so:
19 = XVIIII
1999 = MCMXCVIIII
Another Answer:-
Because of changes made to the rules governing the Roman numeral system in the Middle Ages nowadays we would convert the equivalent of 19 and 1999 into Roman numerals as XIX and MCMXCIX respectively which makes them incompatible in terms of arithmetical reckoning.
But there is historical evidence to suggest that the ancient Romans would have worked out the equivalent of 19 and 1999 on an abacus counting device as XVIIII and MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII then abriged them into written format as IXX and IMM respectively thus facilitating the speed and ease of addition for instance as follows:-
XVIIII+MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII = MMXVIII => 19+1999 = 2018
Alternatively:
IXX+IMM = MMXVIII => (20-1)+(2000-1) = 2018
QED
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the equivalent of 1999 in Roman numerals giving satisfactory reasons why?
MCMXCIX From left to right [ M ] [ CM ] [ XC ] [ 1X ] [1000] + [1000 - 100] + [100 -10] + [ 10 -1] 1000 + 900 + 90 + 9 =1999 M = 1000 C = 100 X = 10 1 = 1
What is the correct conversion of 1999 into roman numerals is it MCMXCIX or IMM giving detailed reasons as to why and why not in your answer?
The correct conversion of 1999 into Roman numerals is MCMXCIX. In Roman numerals, M represents 1000, CM represents 900, XC represents 90, and IX represents 9. By combining these symbols together, we get MCMXCIX, which translates to 1999. The conversion IMM is not correct because it combines I (1) with MM (2000), resulting in a value of 2001.
How would you subtract 499 from 1999 in Roman numerals giving step by step instructions and clear reasons for your answer?
In accordance with the amended rules governing today's Roman numeral system 499 and 1999 converted into Roman numerals are CDXCIX and MCMXCIX respectively which makes it almost impossible to perform any kind of mathematical operations with them. But the Romans themselves in the past most probably wrote out the respective numerals as ID and IMM because:- ID is a simplification of CCCCLXXXXVIIII (499) IMM is a simplification of MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII (1999) So: MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII - CCCCLXXXXVIIII = MD (1500) Alternatively: IMM - ID = MD The Romans would have probably used an abacus calculating device to work out larger numbers and then wrote them out in a simplified form whenever possible.
How did Indian numerals come to be called Arabic numerals?
Indian numerals came to be called Hindu- Arabic numerals for many reasons. Some of those reasons are because they were originated from India where they were using the numerals for 1 to 9 for more than 2,000 years. Arab traders then brought these numerals to the West, As a result, we call them Arabic numerals, or Hindu-Arabic numerals.
What is MDCCLXXVI plus MCMXCIX in Roman numerals giving reasons for your answer?
Mdcclxxvi + mcmxcix = mmmdcclxxvmdcclxxvi = 1000 (m) + 500 (d) + 200 (cc) + 50 (l) + 20 (xx) + 5 (v) + 1 (i) = 1776mcmxcix = 1000(m) + 900 (cm) + 90 (xc) + 9 (ix) = 1999⇒ mdcclxxvi + mcmxcix = 1776 + 1999 = 37753775 = 3000 (mmm) + 500 (d) + 200 (cc) + 50 (l) + 20 (xx) + 5 (v)= mmmdcclxxvImproved Answer:-In accordance with the new rules governing today's Roman numeral system, introduced during the Middle Ages and nearly one thousand years later when there were no Romans around to verify the authenticity of these new rules, 1999 in Roman numerals are reckoned to be MCMXCIX. But to add these numerals to MDCCLXXVI in some kind of logical manner is almost an impossible task.But in fact MCMXCIX probably equals IMM because by adding M+CM+XC+IX in the following manner their total sum is IMM:-M+CM = CMMCMM+XC = XMMXMM+IX = IMM which is probably a simplification of MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII by placing I to both sides of these numerals.So: MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII = MDCCLXXVI = MMMDCCLXXV (3775)Presumably the changes made to the Roman numeral system were made in order for them to be easier to convert into Hindu-Arabic numerals that at the time were being gradually being introduced into Western Europe.Roman numerals: M=1000, D=500, C=100, L=50, X=10, V=5, I=1
What is the equivalent of 1999 in Roman numerals giving satisfactory reasons why?
MCMXCIX From left to right [ M ] [ CM ] [ XC ] [ 1X ] [1000] + [1000 - 100] + [100 -10] + [ 10 -1] 1000 + 900 + 90 + 9 =1999 M = 1000 C = 100 X = 10 1 = 1
Is MCMXCIX bigger or smaller than IMM in Roman numerals or are they both the same giving reasons why?
They are both the same because in todays modern notation of Roman numerals the equivalent of 1999 is MCMXCIX which means 1000+900+90+9 = 1999 But the ancient Romans would have probably gone for the simpler version of IMM which means 2000-1 = 1999
How do you work out 1776 plus 1999 in Roman numerals giving reasons for your answer?
Today we write out 1999 in Roman numerals as MCMXCIX because of changes made to the rules governing the Roman numeral system during the Middle Ages and to add these numerals to MDCCLXXVI is almost impossible. But the Romans themselves would have calculated 1999 on an abacus counting device as MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII and probably simplified them to IMM by placing I to both sides of the numerals. So: MDCCLXXVI + (-I+MM) = MMMDCCLXXV (3775)
How would you add together the four Arabic numerals of 9 99 999 and 1999 using Roman numerals in step by step stages giving reasons for your answer?
Today we would convert the above numbers into Roman numerals as IX, XCIX, CMXCIX and MCMXCIX respectively which makes any form of mathematical operations with them almost impossible. But during the Roman era the equivalent of 9 99 999 and 1999 were probably wrote out in a simplified format of IX, IC, IM and IMM respectively which makes addition straightforward as follows:- IX+IC = CVIII (9+99 = 108) CVIII+IM = MCVII (108+999 = 1,107) MCVII+IMM = MMMCVI (1,107+1,999 = 3,106) So when added together the answer is: MMMCVI which is the equivalent of 3,106
How would you subtract 1776 from 1999 in Roman numerals giving reasons for your answer?
In today's terms 1999 and 1776 expressed in Roman numerals are MCMXCIX and MDCCLXXVI respectively. To find the difference of these numerals is almost impossible because of the way that 1999 is expressed despite the fact that 1776 is correct. But the Romans would have probably expressed these numbers in the following manner IMM and MDCCLXXVI. IMM is a simplification of MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII So: MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII - MDCCLXXVI = CCXXIII (223) by cancelling out the numerals. Check: MDCCLXXVI + CCXXIII = MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII = IMM when simplified The way we work out Roman numerals today is different in the way that the Romans actually did themselves because the rules governing the Roman numeral system were changed in the Middle Ages. Presumably to make it easier to convert Roman numerals into Hindu-Arabic numerals that were gradually being introduced into Western Europe.
What is the correct conversion of 1999 into roman numerals is it MCMXCIX or IMM giving detailed reasons as to why and why not in your answer?
The correct conversion of 1999 into Roman numerals is MCMXCIX. In Roman numerals, M represents 1000, CM represents 900, XC represents 90, and IX represents 9. By combining these symbols together, we get MCMXCIX, which translates to 1999. The conversion IMM is not correct because it combines I (1) with MM (2000), resulting in a value of 2001.
Why did Babylonians develop numerals?
For exactly the same reasons why we need numerals today.
How would you subtract 499 from 1999 in Roman numerals giving step by step instructions and clear reasons for your answer?
In accordance with the amended rules governing today's Roman numeral system 499 and 1999 converted into Roman numerals are CDXCIX and MCMXCIX respectively which makes it almost impossible to perform any kind of mathematical operations with them. But the Romans themselves in the past most probably wrote out the respective numerals as ID and IMM because:- ID is a simplification of CCCCLXXXXVIIII (499) IMM is a simplification of MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII (1999) So: MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII - CCCCLXXXXVIIII = MD (1500) Alternatively: IMM - ID = MD The Romans would have probably used an abacus calculating device to work out larger numbers and then wrote them out in a simplified form whenever possible.
What is MDCCLXXVI plus MCMXCIX in Roman numerals giving reasons for your answer?
Mdcclxxvi + mcmxcix = mmmdcclxxvmdcclxxvi = 1000 (m) + 500 (d) + 200 (cc) + 50 (l) + 20 (xx) + 5 (v) + 1 (i) = 1776mcmxcix = 1000(m) + 900 (cm) + 90 (xc) + 9 (ix) = 1999⇒ mdcclxxvi + mcmxcix = 1776 + 1999 = 37753775 = 3000 (mmm) + 500 (d) + 200 (cc) + 50 (l) + 20 (xx) + 5 (v)= mmmdcclxxvImproved Answer:-In accordance with the new rules governing today's Roman numeral system, introduced during the Middle Ages and nearly one thousand years later when there were no Romans around to verify the authenticity of these new rules, 1999 in Roman numerals are reckoned to be MCMXCIX. But to add these numerals to MDCCLXXVI in some kind of logical manner is almost an impossible task.But in fact MCMXCIX probably equals IMM because by adding M+CM+XC+IX in the following manner their total sum is IMM:-M+CM = CMMCMM+XC = XMMXMM+IX = IMM which is probably a simplification of MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII by placing I to both sides of these numerals.So: MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII = MDCCLXXVI = MMMDCCLXXV (3775)Presumably the changes made to the Roman numeral system were made in order for them to be easier to convert into Hindu-Arabic numerals that at the time were being gradually being introduced into Western Europe.Roman numerals: M=1000, D=500, C=100, L=50, X=10, V=5, I=1
How did Indian numerals come to called Arabic numerals?
Indian numerals came to be called Hindu- Arabic numerals for many reasons. Some of those reasons are because they were originated from India where they were using the numerals for 1 to 9 for more than 2,000 years. Arab traders then brought these numerals to the West, As a result, we call them Arabic numerals, or Hindu-Arabic numerals.
How did Indian numerals come to be called Arabic numerals?
Indian numerals came to be called Hindu- Arabic numerals for many reasons. Some of those reasons are because they were originated from India where they were using the numerals for 1 to 9 for more than 2,000 years. Arab traders then brought these numerals to the West, As a result, we call them Arabic numerals, or Hindu-Arabic numerals.
How did Indian numerals come to be called Hindu-Arabic numerals?
Indian numerals came to be called Hindu- Arabic numerals for many reasons. Some of those reasons are because they were originated from India where they were using the numerals for 1 to 9 for more than 2,000 years. Arab traders then brought these numerals to the West, As a result, we call them Arabic numerals, or Hindu-Arabic numerals.
