There isn't one. Negative numbers go on forever.
An integer is a whole number. So zero could be the smallest integer.
Take your choice: -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 or -1
The largest nonpositive integer is 0.Nonpositive integers include 0, -1, -2, -3, -4, ...continues ad infinitum.A negative number is not larger than a neutral number (AKA: a number not positive or negative). Therefore, no negative number is larger than 0. Of this set, 0 is the largest, since it is the only nonnegative integer.
1 is the smallest positive integer. But if you include negative integers, there is no smallest.
The number zero is not the smallest positive integer. The number one is the smallest positive integer.
The smallest positive integer is 1. The largest negative integer is -1. 1 > -1
The integer is 26
No.
The smallest integer would be -6
The smallest positive integer is 1. 1 is the multiplicative identity; ie anything times 1 is itself. The greatest negative integer is the most positive negative integer which is -1. Therefore the product of the greatest negative integer and the smallest positive integer is the greatest negative integer which is -1.
They are the number 0 and negative integers.
No, there is not. Suppose k lay claim to be the smallest integer. Then k-1 is and integer and it is smaller than k. So k cannot be the smallest.