0
What would the world be like without the Archimedes contribution?
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What would the world be like without fractions?
it wouldn't
Why is not possible for the Archimedes to move the Earth with the lever?
For Archimedes to move the Earth with a lever he would need: - a rock to put under the Earth (to act as a fulcrum) - a board/stick long enough & strong enough to lift the Earth - somewhere to stand....he can't stand ON the Earth and move it, so where would he stand?..........in space?
What would the world be without math?
We would not be. Everything you see is a mathematical formula. Water, humans, fruit, chicken................................. Everything!!!!!
What is the story behind Archimedes principle?
The Story Behind the ScienceHieron, the king of Syracuse and Archimedes' friend, wanted to know whether his crown was made of solid gold. The king suspected that the gold had been mixed with silver, which is worth less than gold. So he asked Archimedes to try to resolve the question. The solution would have been easy if the king had allowed the crown to be melted down. Since that was no possible, Archimedes had to find another solution to determine the metal content of the crown. Archimedes discovered the answer while at a public bath. He noticed that when he got into the water, it overflowed the tub. By measuring the overflow, he found that the volume-the amount of space a thing occupies-of the spilled water was equal to the volume of his body under water. He realized he could determine the gold content of the crown by measuring the water it would displace against the amount of water displaced by a lump of gold weighing the same as the crown. The crown and lump of gold would each displace the same amount of water if the crown were solid gold. If the crown contained silver, it would displace more water, since the volume of a weight of silver is greater than the volume of the same weight of gold. With this discovery, Archimedes leaped from his bath and in his excitement raced naked down the street toward his home, shouting "EUREKA! I have found it!"Archimedes was the first to develop the physical law that is now known as Archimedes' law. The law explains buoyancy, or why objects seem to lose weight in water or other liquids. This principle has been applied ever since to test precious metals.
What was Archimedes accidental discovery?
The most widely known anecdote about Archimedes tells of how he invented a method for determining the volume of an object with an irregular shape. According to Vitruvious, a new crown in the shape of a laurel wreath had been made for King Hiero II, and Archimedes was asked to determine whether it was of solid gold, or whether silver had been added by a dishonest goldsmith. Archimedes had to solve the problem without damaging the crown, so he could not melt it down into a regularly shaped body in order to calculate its density. While taking a bath, he noticed that the level of the water in the tub rose as he got in, and realized that this effect could be used to determine the volume of the crown. For practical purposes water is incompressible, so the submerged crown would displace an amount of water equal to its own volume. By dividing the weight of the crown by the volume of water displaced, the density of the crown could be obtained. This density would be lower than that of gold if cheaper and less dense metals had been added. Archimedes then took to the streets naked, so excited by his discovery that he had forgotten to dress, crying "Eureka!" (Greek: "εὕρηκα!," meaning "I have found it!")The story of the golden crown does not appear in the known works of Archimedes. Moreover, the practicality of the method it describes has been called into question, due to the extreme accuracy with which one would have to measure the water displacement. Archimedes may have instead sought a solution that applied the principle known in hydrostatics as Archimedes' Principle, which he describes in his treatiseOn Floating Bodies. This principle states that a body immersed in a fluid experiences a buoyant force equal to the weight of the fluid it displaces. Using this principle, it would have been possible to compare the density of the golden crown to that of solid gold by balancing the crown on a scale with a gold reference sample, then immersing the apparatus in water. If the crown was less dense than gold, it would displace more water due to its larger volume, and thus experience a greater buoyant force than the reference sample. This difference in buoyancy would cause the scale to tip accordingly. Galileo considered it "probable that this method is the same that Archimedes followed, since, besides being very accurate, it is based on demonstrations found by Archimedes himself.
What do you think is the greatest contribution of science to the world?
Archimedes Inventing pi think about what the world would be like without it
What was Archimedes' major contribution to the world of water pumps?
That would be "Archimedes' screw". See link provided:
What contribution to history did World War I make?
Easy, think about it - without World War 1, World War 2 would never have happened...! Therefore, WW1's contribution to history was WW2...!
How would life be different without Aprille Ericsson contribution?
'lkl;lkj;
How would you describe Archimedes?
sup
What would be a good sentence for Archimedes principle?
no
How would life be different without Charles Darwin?
Without Charles contribution there would be no new ideas and no new views about Gods creation. There would not have been more ideas added on.
What is Darwins greatest scientific contribution?
Charles Darwin's greatest scientific contribution is his work on the Theory of Evolution. Without it, the fact that plants and animals evolved from its ancestors would not have been discovered.
What would the world be like without skateboarding?
The world would suck without skate boarding because without it what would be fun?
How would life be different without Galileo contribution to science?
In one respect, the world would be pretty much the same with or without Einstein's contributions, because physics is - it does not depend on equations - those equations simply describe what is already happening or what is perceived to happen. In another respect, without Einstein, one possible outcome is that Hitler and the Nazis would have won World War II, and that would change everything.
How would you use Archimedes experiment today?
In the well.
What would happen if Archimedes didnt make the water pump?
If Archimedes hadn't invented the water pump, it would have greatly hindered the development of various hydraulic systems and technologies. Without his invention, tasks such as draining flooded areas, providing irrigation for agriculture, and supplying water to cities would have been much more challenging. Additionally, the understanding of buoyancy and fluid mechanics would have been significantly delayed or limited.
