x ≤ -sqrt(11)
or
x ≥ sqrt(11)
There is insufficient information for us to even begin to understand this question. Please edit the question to include more context or relevant information. There is no inequality in the question.
Yes, but only when the inequality is not a strict inequality: thatis to say it is a "less than or equal to" or "more than or equal to" inequality. In such cases, the solution to the "or equal to" aspect will satisfy the corresponding inequality.
Which region you shade depends on whether you are required to shade the possible values or the values that need t be rejected. In 2 or more dimensions, you would normally shade the regions to be rejected - values that are not solutions. With a set of inequalities, this will result in an unshaded region (if any) any point of which will satisfy all the equations.If the inequality is written in the form x < N where N is some given value, then the possible solutions are to the left of N and the rejected values are to the right. Whether the value N, itself, is shaded or not depends on whether the inequality is strict or not.
because writing out all the solutions is not necessarliy a correct answer but a number line is and because graphing out also helps you get a mental image of the concept.
On a global scale it's rather equal.
NO! abs(2-2)=0 NOT equal to abs(2)+abs(-2)=4 - The above is technically correct, though the more thorough answer is as follows; no because the absolute value of the sum is LESS THEN OR EQUAL TO the sum of the absolute values. The simple proof the the fact that |A+B|<=|A|+|B| is called the triangular inequality. When A and B (or for that matter an infinite number of them) are both positive (or all) or both negative (or all) then they inequality is actually equal, if however any of the numbers have different signs then any other number, the inequality is less then.
If an inequality states "no more than," you would use the less than or equal to sign (≤). This indicates that the value can be either less than or equal to a specified number. For example, if the inequality is expressing that a variable ( x ) is no more than 10, it would be written as ( x ≤ 10 ).
An inequality is not a reflexive relationship.
Inequalities are less than, equal to, less than or equal to, or more than or equal to. Inequalities can NOT contain an equal sign.
No, inequalities have more than, less then, at least, or no more than signs. Equations just have equal signs. An inequality answer can't be written as just a number it has to have a sign with it.
The inequality symbol that represents the statement "no more than" is "≤" (less than or equal to). This symbol indicates that a value can be equal to or less than a specified limit. For example, if a variable ( x ) is described as "no more than 10," it can be expressed as ( x ≤ 10 ).
It's the "less than" sign [ < ] above the "equals" sign [ = ].≤When you see it, you read it " ... less than or equal to ... ". That's the same as " ... no more than ... "