Study guides

☆☆

Q: Why multiple of 4 is not a multiple of 2?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Related questions

No. 2 is a factor of 4. 4 is a multiple of 2.

Any multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2.

Is a multiple of 2 also a multiple of 4

No. 2 is a factor of 4. 4 is a multiple of 2.

No, but vice versa holds true. Case and point: 6 is a multiple of 2, but not a multiple of 4. 8 is a multiple of 4, and is a multiple of 2. Because a factor of 4 is 2, every multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2. But since 4 is not a factor of 2, rather, only half of it, only half of the multiples of 2 will be multiples of 4.

4 4 is the second multiple of 2 and the first multiple of itself, so it is the LCM of 2 and 4.

1 is a factor of 4 that is not a multiple of 2.

it is 4,4 is a multiple of 4 by 1and4 is a multiple of 2 by 2

4 and any multiple of 4

It's not. 4 is a multiple of 2. 2 is a factor of 4 because it can divide into 4 evenly with no remainder.

No, 90 is a multiple of 2 and 5, but not 4.

Any multiple of 4.

People also asked