If the decimal is positive, than a negative number is less than 0.
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. So, 0.9 is actually the same as 0.90, right? And 0.90 is definitely bigger than 0.10 because, like, 0.90 is, you know, closer to 1 than 0.10. So yeah, 0.9 is bigger than 0.10.
Since neither of these numbers has a decimal point, it can only be inferred that you are referring to integers - of which 788 is larger than 787.
Smaller. If you have trouble understanding that, then pad out 0.8 with an extra zero and make it 0.80. That is the same thing. Thus 0.75 is smaller than 0.80.
5.2
if you change it into a decimal then you will know
53.125 is bigger than 52.916666.
7.5 is bigger than 5.77 but .5 is smaller than .77 so 5.77 has the bigger decimal than 7.5
4.3 is bigger than 4.0
0.86 is bigger than 0.68
5.08 is bigger than 5.079
No, 42 is a whole number and 0.42 is a decimal. 0.42 is not even bigger than 1. If you do not get this, just know this, 42 is also 42.0 and is bigger than 0.42.
No a decimal is smaller than a whole number.
If the decimal is positive, than a negative number is less than 0.
If the decimal is positive, than a negative number is less than 0.
Yes. Always look to the numbers to the left of the decimal point. If the number to the furthest left is bigger, that number is automatically bigger than the other. in this case before the decimal point you have a zero in both. In this case, you move right one (to the tenths position). The 9 is bigger than the 6 so 0.9 is bigger than 0.625
The decimal 1.5 is bigger than 1.05