Proof By Contradiction:
Claim: R\Q = Set of irrationals is countable.
Then R = Q union (R\Q)
Since Q is countable, and R\Q is countable (by claim), R is countable because the union of countable sets is countable.
But this is a contradiction since R is uncountable (Cantor's Diagonal Argument).
Thus, R\Q is uncountable.
Chat with our AI personalities
You can choose an irrational number to be either greater or smaller than any given rational number. On the other hand, if you mean which set is greater: the set of irrational numbers is greater. The set of rational numbers is countable infinite (beth-0); the set of irrational numbers is uncountable infinite (more specifically, beth-1 - there are larger uncountable numbers as well).
There is no representation for irrational numbers: they are represented as real numbers that are not rational. The set of real numbers is R and set of rational numbers is Q so that the set of irrational numbers is the complement if Q in R.
the set of real numbers
real numbers
An irrational number is any real number that cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers.So yes, an irrational number IS a real number.There is also a set of numbers called transcendental numbers, which includes both real and complex/imaginary numbers. Of this set, all the real numbers are irrational numbers.