It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational. It is not an integer, whole number or irrational.
Yes, -3 is an integer.
No integer is an irrational number. An irrational number is a number that cannot be represented as an integer or a fraction.All integers which are whole numbers are rational numbers.
No by definition a decimal number can never be an integer because an integer is a whole number (it can not have any decimal parts).
It is a real number, a rational number, an integer.
If you mean 0.75 then it is 3/4 as a fraction in its simplest form
075
No, 3.4 is not an integer. It is a rational number and a real number, but not an integer.
A rational number which is an integer can be simplified to a form in which the denominator is 1. That is not possible for a rational number which is not an integer.
The number 14.5 is a decimal and not an integer. An integer is any number which is a whole number.
Every integer is a rational number.
It depends, if a number with positive integers is greater than the number with the negative integer therefore the sum will be in positive integer. And if the number with positive integer is less than the number with the number with negative integer then the sum will be in negative integer.
No, it is a decimal number.
Unless the integer is fractional it is not an irrational number.
A decimal number is not an integer. An integer is a number that is not a fraction, and decimal numbers are decimal fractions.
.125 is bigger because the first number after the decimal is bigger.
No, an integer is a whole number, 53.11 is not a whole number. Thus, 53.11 is not an integer.