No, equality of numbers has a reflexive property. Perpendicularity of lines has a symmetric property.
A statement that undergoes the reflexive property is a statement that is turned backwards. Ex. Original- If an animal is a frog, it is an amphibian. Reflexive- If an animal is an amphibian, it is a frog.
Call the relation R. Also, x R y means (x, y) is in R. (For an idea of how that works, in the set called <, the first element of each ordered pair is always smaller than the second.) Now, a relation is reflexive if, for all x in the domain of R, x R x. That is, (x, x) is in R. A few examples are =, ≤, | (or, "is divisible by"), and the ever familiar, "plus some integer equals."
(1) transitive, (2) reflexive
The reflexive property simply says that A=A, in other words, any number is equal to itself.
A=r mod z R= a relation which is reflexive symmetric but not transitive
No, equality of numbers has a reflexive property. Perpendicularity of lines has a symmetric property.
No, it is not.
A relation that is irreflexive, or anti-reflexive, is a binary relation on a set where no element is related to itself.
A statement that undergoes the reflexive property is a statement that is turned backwards. Ex. Original- If an animal is a frog, it is an amphibian. Reflexive- If an animal is an amphibian, it is a frog.
when x is not an element of the set, it is both reflexive and irreflexive by vacuos truth
No. Do your own homework. http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache:ZZmsH0jKHH8J:www.cs.utk.edu/~horton/hw1.pdf+For+each+part+give+a+relation+that+satisfies+the+condition+a+Reflexive+and+symmetric+but+not+transitive+b+Reflexive+and+transitive+but+not+symmetric+c+Symmetric+and+transitive+but+not+reflexive%3F&hl=en&gl=us&sig=AFQjCNHGyc1EDhfqj_mu-RV9yTYZZfXl6A
the total no of reflexive relation on an n- element set is 2^(n^2-n).
An relation is equivalent if and only if it is symmetric, reflexive and transitive. That is, if a ~ b and b ~a, if a ~ a, and if a ~ b, and b ~ c, then a ~ c.
An equivalence relation on a set is one that is transitive, reflexive and symmetric. Given a set A with n elements, the largest equivalence relation is AXA since it has n2 elements. Given any element a of the set, the smallest equivalence relation is (a,a) which has n elements.
void reflexive(int a[], int sizeOfA, int b[], int sizeOfB) { bool hold = true; for(i = 0; i < sizeOfA && hold; ++i ) { for( int j = 0; j < sizeOfB && hold; ++j ) { int elemA = a[i]; int elemB = b[i]; if(a[i] == b[i]) { hold = true; break; } } if(hold == false) { cout << "Reflexive - No" << endl; break; } } if(hold == true) cout << "Reflexive - Yes" << endl; }
Call the relation R. Also, x R y means (x, y) is in R. (For an idea of how that works, in the set called <, the first element of each ordered pair is always smaller than the second.) Now, a relation is reflexive if, for all x in the domain of R, x R x. That is, (x, x) is in R. A few examples are =, ≤, | (or, "is divisible by"), and the ever familiar, "plus some integer equals."