No. 5 and 2 are real numbers. Their difference, 3, is a rational number.
Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
Can be rational or irrational.
Any of the numbers which cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers is irrational.
In between any two rational numbers there is an irrational number. In between any two irrational numbers there is a rational number.
The sum or the difference between two irrational numbers could either be rational or irrational, however, it should be a real number.
It could be either.
The sum, or difference, of two irrational numbers can be rational, or irrational. For example, if A = square root of 2 and B = square root of 3, both the sum and difference are irrational. If A = (1 + square root of 2), and B = square root of 2, then, while both are irrational, the difference (equal to 1) is rational.
There is no number which can be rational and irrational so there is no point in asking "how".
The difference can be rational or irrational.5 + sqrt(3) and 2 + sqrt(3) are both irrational numbers but their difference is[5 + sqrt(3)] - [2 + sqrt(3)] = 3, which is rational.
No. 5 and 2 are real numbers. Their difference, 3, is a rational number.
Not necessarily. The sum of two irrational numbers can be rational or irrational.
No. sqrt(3) - sqrt(2) is irrational.
All natural numbers are rational numbers. No irrational numbers are natural numbers.
If you multiply two irrational numbers, the result can be rational, or irrational.
The difference is that rational numbers can be expressed as fractions whereas irrational numbers can not be expressed as fractions.
yes * * * * * No. Rational and irrational numbers are two DISJOINT subsets of the real numbers. That is, no rational number is irrational and no irrational is rational.