Oh, dude, you're throwing some numbers at me like we're playing math dodgeball. So, like, to find the pattern, it's like taking a stroll through a number garden. If you squint real hard, you'll see that we're just subtracting decreasing numbers each time. So, the next number is probably going to be like -4 minus something, but who's really keeping track, right?
Oh, what a lovely little series we have here! Let's take a closer look. It seems like we're subtracting decreasing numbers each time. So, if we continue that pattern, the next number would be 58 - 63, which gives us -5. Remember, there are no mistakes, just happy little accidents in math!
298 less 209 is 89 209 less 129 is 80 129 less 58 is 71 58 less -4 is 62 The result of each subsequent equation is 9 less than the previous one (89, 80, 71...). The next result is going to be 62-9=53. The first number in each equation above is the same as the second number in the previous equation: 298 less 209 is 89 209 less 129 is 80So, the next equation will be: -4 less X is 53 Therefore, X is the next number in the original sequence, which resolves to: -57
There are two consecutive even integers that equal -298: -150 and -148.
The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadraticUn = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadraticUn = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadraticUn = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadraticUn = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.
6,12, 18, 24, 30, 36,42,48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102, 108, 114, 120, 126, 132, 138, 144, 150, 156, 162, 178, 184, 190, 196, 202, 208, 214, 220, 226, 232, 238, 244, 250, 256, 262, 268, 274, 280, 286, 292, 298 etc.
The triangle is the Classical Greek Capital Letter ' Delta'. 'D' in modern English. 'Delta/D' means the difference in temperature. Q = m DeltaT c Energy (joule) = mass(kg) X (Difference in Temperature)T(K) X specific heat capacity. Ignoring the other terms, if the starting temperature is 273 K and the final temperature is 298K, then 'DeltaT' = ( 298-273 = 25K) Note the temperature scale is Kelvin(K) because this eliminates the use of 'Zero/ 0oC'. in the system.
-57
-57
-57
-57
-57
The sequence is formed by subtracting 89 at the first step and then reducing this figure by 9 at each successive step. 298 - 89 = 209 209 - 80 = 129 129 - 71 = 58 58 - 62 = -4 -4 - 53 = -57........this is the next number in the series.
-57 298 - 89 = 209 209 - 80 = 129 129 - 71 = 58 58 - 62 = -4 -4 - 53 = -57 notice every number is subtracted by 9 less than the previous number's subtrator
At each step the number being subtracted is reduced by 9 298 - 89 = 209 209 - 80 = 129 129 - 71 = 58 58 - 62 = -4 -4 - 53 = -57..........which is the next number.
-57... You're subtracting 9 from the difference each time.
-57
The difference between one number and the next in the sequence is decreasing by 9 each time. Therefore, the difference between -4 and the next number will be equal to 62 - 9 = 53. The next number is therefore equal to -4 - 53 = -57.
298 less 209 is 89 209 less 129 is 80 129 less 58 is 71 58 less -4 is 62 The result of each subsequent equation is 9 less than the previous one (89, 80, 71...). The next result is going to be 62-9=53. The first number in each equation above is the same as the second number in the previous equation: 298 less 209 is 89 209 less 129 is 80So, the next equation will be: -4 less X is 53 Therefore, X is the next number in the original sequence, which resolves to: -57