0
The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.
The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadratic
Un = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.
The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.
The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadratic
Un = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.
The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.
The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadratic
Un = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.
The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.
The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadratic
Un = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Fran
Taiga
DevinThe answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.
The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadratic
Un = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Next number in series 298 209 129 58 -4?
298 less 209 is 89 209 less 129 is 80 129 less 58 is 71 58 less -4 is 62 The result of each subsequent equation is 9 less than the previous one (89, 80, 71...). The next result is going to be 62-9=53. The first number in each equation above is the same as the second number in the previous equation: 298 less 209 is 89 209 less 129 is 80So, the next equation will be: -4 less X is 53 Therefore, X is the next number in the original sequence, which resolves to: -57
Next in series 298 209 129 58 -4?
Oh, dude, you're throwing some numbers at me like we're playing math dodgeball. So, like, to find the pattern, it's like taking a stroll through a number garden. If you squint real hard, you'll see that we're just subtracting decreasing numbers each time. So, the next number is probably going to be like -4 minus something, but who's really keeping track, right?
What is the sum of 621 with three consecutive numbers?
The three numbers are 205, 207 and 209.
What are the factors of 418?
The positive integer factors of 418 are: 1, 2, 11, 19, 22, 38, 209, 418
X 2-10x equals 21?
Assuming x(2-10x)=21 to be solved for x, distribute to -10x2+2x=21, or 10x2-2x+21=0. By the quadratic equation, we can determine there are no real solutions because the square root of -836 does not exist. In imaginary solutions, we can reduce to 1/10*(1 + sqrt(-209)) and 1/10*(1-sqrt(-209)) as solutions.
