The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.
The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadratic
Un = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.
The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.
The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadratic
Un = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.
The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.
The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadratic
Un = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.
The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.
The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadratic
Un = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.
The answer can be any number that you like: it is always possible to find a polynomial of order 5 to fit the given numbers and any other number.
The lowest degree polynomial that will fit the given numbers is the quadratic
Un = (9n2 - 205n + 792)/2 for n = 1, 2, 3, .. . and that gives the next number as -57.
298 less 209 is 89 209 less 129 is 80 129 less 58 is 71 58 less -4 is 62 The result of each subsequent equation is 9 less than the previous one (89, 80, 71...). The next result is going to be 62-9=53. The first number in each equation above is the same as the second number in the previous equation: 298 less 209 is 89 209 less 129 is 80So, the next equation will be: -4 less X is 53 Therefore, X is the next number in the original sequence, which resolves to: -57
Oh, dude, you're throwing some numbers at me like we're playing math dodgeball. So, like, to find the pattern, it's like taking a stroll through a number garden. If you squint real hard, you'll see that we're just subtracting decreasing numbers each time. So, the next number is probably going to be like -4 minus something, but who's really keeping track, right?
The three numbers are 205, 207 and 209.
The positive integer factors of 418 are: 1, 2, 11, 19, 22, 38, 209, 418
Assuming x(2-10x)=21 to be solved for x, distribute to -10x2+2x=21, or 10x2-2x+21=0. By the quadratic equation, we can determine there are no real solutions because the square root of -836 does not exist. In imaginary solutions, we can reduce to 1/10*(1 + sqrt(-209)) and 1/10*(1-sqrt(-209)) as solutions.
-57
-57
-57
-57
-57
The sequence is formed by subtracting 89 at the first step and then reducing this figure by 9 at each successive step. 298 - 89 = 209 209 - 80 = 129 129 - 71 = 58 58 - 62 = -4 -4 - 53 = -57........this is the next number in the series.
-57 298 - 89 = 209 209 - 80 = 129 129 - 71 = 58 58 - 62 = -4 -4 - 53 = -57 notice every number is subtracted by 9 less than the previous number's subtrator
The difference between one number and the next in the sequence is decreasing by 9 each time. Therefore, the difference between -4 and the next number will be equal to 62 - 9 = 53. The next number is therefore equal to -4 - 53 = -57.
-57The first two numbers in the series has a difference of 89. The next two numbers (209, 129) has a difference of 80. The next two (129,58) has a difference of 71. As you can see the differences change by 9, so the next two numbers in the series (58, -4) has a difference of 62. Following this pattern, the next two numbers in the series will have a difference of 53. So the next number in this series will be (-4-53 = -57).
At each step the number being subtracted is reduced by 9 298 - 89 = 209 209 - 80 = 129 129 - 71 = 58 58 - 62 = -4 -4 - 53 = -57..........which is the next number.
-57
298 less 209 is 89 209 less 129 is 80 129 less 58 is 71 58 less -4 is 62 The result of each subsequent equation is 9 less than the previous one (89, 80, 71...). The next result is going to be 62-9=53. The first number in each equation above is the same as the second number in the previous equation: 298 less 209 is 89 209 less 129 is 80So, the next equation will be: -4 less X is 53 Therefore, X is the next number in the original sequence, which resolves to: -57